Agenta vs Google ADK

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026
Agenta logo

Agenta

Agentatech UG

The open-source workspace for your agents

Open Source
81% verification coverage
VS
Google ADK logo

Google ADK

Google

Build production agents, not prototypes.

Open Source
75% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Agenta

GDPR
SOC 2

Google ADK

Customers (per vendor):Revionics

Overall Winner: Agenta

7.7/10 vs Google ADK at 5.3/10

Leads in:
Customization
Integration
Performance

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Agenta

7.7

avg score

Google ADK

5.3

avg score

Agenta leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Customization and 2 more.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Agenta

7.7 / 10

Agenta

Best For
Engineering teams building code review or operations agents with full control over their stack
Product teams automating research and reporting workflows with human oversight
Teams running AI agents on their own infrastructure
Organizations requiring robust governance and compliance for AI automation

Google ADK

Best For
Developers building AI agents
Enterprises deploying AI agents at scale
Teams needing reliable AI agent workflows

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Agenta is best for

🤖Automation & Agents4.7📊Data & Analytics4.0

Google ADK is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.8🎧Customer Support6.0📊Data & Analytics5.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

AgentaAgenta

Cons

  • Cloud Hobby plan limits team members to two and trace data retention to one week
Google ADKGoogle ADK

Cons

  • Requires Python 3.10+ or Java 17+ for certain runtime requirements
  • Deployment to production requires synchronous definition of McpToolset in agent.py
  • Does not automatically re-establish active MCP connections upon session restoration
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

Agenta

7.7

/ 10

Clear winner

Google ADK

5.3

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Agenta
4.0▲ +2.0
Google ADK
2.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Agenta
10.0▲ +2.0
Google ADK
8.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Agenta
8.0
Google ADK
8.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Agenta
9.0▲ +1.0
Google ADK
8.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Agenta
7.0▲ +6.0
Google ADK
1.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Agenta
8.0▲ +3.0
Google ADK
5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Agenta
—
Google ADK
—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Agenta

Task

Google ADK

6.0
Role Definition
8.0
4.0
Task Decomposition
7.0
3.0
Agent Coordination
9.0
2.0
Inter Agent Communication
8.0
8.0
Workflow Orchestration
9.0
8.0
Tool Use Delegation
8.0
6.0
State Management
8.0
4.0
Error Recovery
7.0
9.0
Observability
8.0
3.0
Scalability Throughput
7.0
4.0
Task Delegation
8.0
3.0
Parallel Execution
8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Agenta and Google ADK?
Agenta — "The open-source workspace for your agents". Google ADK — "Build production agents, not prototypes". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.
Who is Agenta best for compared with Google ADK?
Agenta is best for Engineering teams building code review or operations agents with full control over their stack; and for Product teams automating research and reporting workflows with human oversight. Google ADK is best for Developers building AI agents; and for Enterprises deploying AI agents at scale.
How does the pricing of Agenta compare with Google ADK?
Agenta is open source, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $29/month. Google ADK is open source, includes a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Does Agenta or Google ADK have a free plan?
Agenta is open source. Google ADK is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Do Agenta and Google ADK offer an API?
Agenta offers a public API. Google ADK offers a public API.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.