Agenta vs OutSystems

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026
Agenta logo

Agenta

Agentatech UG

The open-source workspace for your agents

Open Source
81% verification coverage
VS
OutSystems logo

OutSystems

OutSystems

Your AI development platform built for the enterprise.

Freemium
76% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Agenta

GDPR
SOC 2

OutSystems

Users:500K-1M
Customers (per vendor):Honda, HEINEKEN, Thermo Fisher +4
GDPR
SOC 2
HIPAA

Overall Winner: Agenta

7.7/10 vs OutSystems at 4.5/10

Leads in:
Customization
Integration
Support

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Agenta

7.7

avg score

OutSystems

4.5

avg score

Agenta leads overall — particularly in Customization and Support and 2 more.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Agenta

7.7 / 10

Agenta

Best For
Engineering teams building code review or operations agents with full control over their stack
Product teams automating research and reporting workflows with human oversight
Teams running AI agents on their own infrastructure
Organizations requiring robust governance and compliance for AI automation

OutSystems

Best For
Regulated enterprises modernizing legacy systems
Teams building custom AI applications and agents
Organizations needing enterprise-grade security and governance for AI
Businesses automating complex internal workflows

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Agenta is best for

🤖Automation & Agents4.7📊Data & Analytics4.0

OutSystems is best for

🎨Image & Design9.0📊Data & Analytics9.0✍️Writing & Content8.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

AgentaAgenta

Cons

  • Cloud Hobby plan limits team members to two and trace data retention to one week
OutSystemsOutSystems

Cons

  • Pricing is custom and requires contacting sales for most tiers.
  • Compliance options are limited to ISO 27001 on the standard platform, with additional certifications available as add-ons.
  • Uptime guarantee is 99.5% on the standard platform, with an upgrade to 99.95% available as an add-on.
  • Application end-users start with 100 internal users, with additional users requiring add-ons.
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

Agenta

7.7

/ 10

Clear winner

OutSystems

4.5

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Agenta
4.0▲ +1.0
OutSystems
3.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Agenta
10.0▲ +6.0
OutSystems
4.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Agenta
8.0▲ +3.0
OutSystems
5.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Agenta
9.0▲ +5.0
OutSystems
4.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Agenta
7.0▲ +1.0
OutSystems
6.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Agenta
8.0▲ +3.0
OutSystems
5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Agenta
—
OutSystems
—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Agenta

Task

OutSystems

6.0
Role Definition
7.0
4.0
Task Decomposition
6.0
3.0
Agent Coordination
8.0
2.0
Inter Agent Communication
6.0
8.0
Workflow Orchestration
9.0
8.0
Tool Use Delegation
7.0
6.0
State Management
7.0
4.0
Error Recovery
5.0
9.0
Observability
8.0
3.0
Scalability Throughput
7.0
4.0
Task Delegation
7.0
3.0
Parallel Execution
5.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Agenta and OutSystems?
Agenta — "The open-source workspace for your agents". OutSystems — "Your AI development platform built for the enterprise". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.
Who is Agenta best for compared with OutSystems?
Agenta is best for Engineering teams building code review or operations agents with full control over their stack; and for Product teams automating research and reporting workflows with human oversight. OutSystems is best for Regulated enterprises modernizing legacy systems; and for Teams building custom AI applications and agents.
How does the pricing of Agenta compare with OutSystems?
Agenta is open source, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $29/month. OutSystems is freemium, includes a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Does Agenta or OutSystems have a free plan?
Agenta is open source. OutSystems has a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.