Amp vs Devika

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026

Amp

Amp Frontier Corporation

The frontier coding agent — web, terminal & phone

Freemium

83% verification coverage

Devika

winfunc (formerly Stition AI)

Open-source agentic AI software engineer (open Devin alternative)

Open Source

73% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Amp

Uptime:99.40% (90-day)Status page

Users:1M-10M

Customers (per vendor):Intel, Westpac, Indeed +7

SOC 2

Devika

Trust data not available yet

Overall Winner: Amp

5.7/10 vs Devika at 3.9/10

Leads in:

Planning Quality

Customization

Integration

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Amp

5.7

avg score

Devika

3.9

avg score

Amp leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Customization and 3 more.

Devika has an edge in Support.

Based on 7 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Amp

5.7 / 10

Amp

Best For

Developers running several long-lived agents in parallel without local worktrees or port conflicts

Teams that want agents to wake on outside events like a new Linear issue or CI failing on main

Developers who want to review agent changes and preview the running app from any device

Teams collaborating on the same agent session together via multiplayer orbs

Devika

Best For

Developers experimenting with autonomous coding agents on personal projects

Users who want to run an agentic coder locally against Ollama models

Contributors wanting to help build an open Devin alternative

Developers who need an agent that browses the web while writing code

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Amp is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research9.0

Devika is best for

🎧Customer Support6.0✍️Writing & Content4.0💬Chat & Conversation4.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Amp

Cons

No cons listed yet.

Devika

Cons

Explicitly early-stage: 'There are a lot of unimplemented/broken features at the moment'
Requires Python 3.10 to 3.11, Node.js 18+, bun and uv
Requires your own API keys for search (Bing/Google) and for each model provider
Best performance requires the Claude 3 model family per the README's own note

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Amp

5.7

/ 10

Clear winner

Devika

3.9

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Amp

3.0▲ +2.0

Devika

1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Amp

7.0▲ +3.0

Devika

4.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Amp

5.0

Devika

8.0▲ +3.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Amp

7.0▲ +6.0

Devika

1.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Amp

4.0▲ +3.0

Devika

1.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Amp

5.0

Devika

5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Amp

9.0▲ +2.0

Devika

7.0

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Amp

Task

Devika

9.0

Bug Detection

4.0

9.0

Code Explanation

3.0

9.0

Refactoring

3.0

8.0

Test Generation

4.0

8.0

Multi Language Support

6.0

9.0

Context Understanding

4.0

7.0

Documentation Generation

4.0

6.0

Performance Optimization

2.0

5.0

Security Scanning

1.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Amp and Devika?

Amp — "The frontier coding agent — web, terminal & phone". Devika — "Open-source agentic AI software engineer (open Devin alternative)". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Amp best for compared with Devika?

Amp is best for Developers running several long-lived agents in parallel without local worktrees or port conflicts; and for Teams that want agents to wake on outside events like a new Linear issue or CI failing on main. Devika is best for Developers experimenting with autonomous coding agents on personal projects; and for Users who want to run an agentic coder locally against Ollama models.

How does the pricing of Amp compare with Devika?

Amp is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $20/month. Devika is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Amp or Devika have a free plan?

Amp has a free plan. Devika is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Explore Alternatives

Amp Alternatives

Tools similar to Amp

Devika Alternatives

Tools similar to Devika

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.