Autify vs Devin

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026

Autify

Autify Inc.

Accelerate and simplify the entire Software Testing Lifecycle through AI

Freemium

74% verification coverage

Devin

Cognition Labs

The AI software engineer

Paid

76% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Autify

Uptime:100.00%Status page

Customers (per vendor):GA technologies, Fernish, GoBanking Rates +7

SOC 2

Devin

Uptime:99.80%Status page

Customers (per vendor):GE Aerospace, Mercedes-Benz, Nubank +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Devin

6.3/10 vs Autify at 5.3/10

Leads in:

Planning Quality

Integration

Customization

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Autify

5.3

avg score

Devin

6.3

avg score

Devin leads overall — particularly in Integration and Compliance & Data Protection and 1 more.

Autify has an edge in Ease of Use.

Based on 7 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Devin

6.3 / 10

Autify

Best For

QA Engineers focused on test strategy and design, not script maintenance

Engineering Managers seeking full visibility into test coverage with less overhead

Product Teams who understand application behavior and want to contribute to testing

Small teams needing automated end-to-end testing for web and mobile applications

Devin

Best For

Engineering teams managing complex, multi-repo projects

Developers automating code migrations and refactors

Software development teams needing autonomous bug fixing and issue triage

Enterprises seeking to accelerate modernization of legacy systems

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Autify is best for

✍️Writing & Content5.0💬Chat & Conversation5.0🤖Automation & Agents4.3

Devin is best for

🔍Research9.0✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Autify

Cons

Desktop app testing is only available on the Enterprise plan
Safari and Firefox browser support are planned for end of 2025
Playwright code export/import and test sharing are not available for free users
GenAI features for Nexus are contact sales only for Professional and Enterprise tiers
No explicit mention of a free trial for Aximo's paid plans, only a free individual user tier

Devin

Cons

No cons listed yet.

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Autify

5.3

/ 10

Devin

6.3

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Autify

6.0▲ +3.0

Devin

3.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Autify

6.0

Devin

7.0▲ +1.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Autify

6.0

Devin

7.0▲ +1.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Autify

5.0

Devin

8.0▲ +3.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Autify

3.0

Devin

5.0▲ +2.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Autify

5.0

Devin

5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Autify

6.0

Devin

9.0▲ +3.0

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Autify

Task

Devin

1.0

Code Completion

6.0

Bug Detection

8.0

2.0

Code Explanation

7.0

1.0

Refactoring

9.0

8.0

Test Generation

8.0

3.0

Multi Language Support

8.0

5.0

Context Understanding

8.0

4.0

Documentation Generation

8.0

1.0

Performance Optimization

5.0

1.0

Security Scanning

9.0

2.0

Api Management

5.0

8.0

Ci Cd Integration

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Autify and Devin?

Autify — "Accelerate and simplify the entire Software Testing Lifecycle through AI". Devin — "The AI software engineer". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Autify best for compared with Devin?

Autify is best for QA Engineers focused on test strategy and design, not script maintenance; and for Engineering Managers seeking full visibility into test coverage with less overhead. Devin is best for Engineering teams managing complex, multi-repo projects; and for Developers automating code migrations and refactors.

How does the pricing of Autify compare with Devin?

Autify is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $120/month. Devin is paid, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $20/month. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Autify or Devin have a free plan?

Autify has a free plan. Devin has a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Do Autify and Devin offer an API?

Autify offers a public API. Devin offers a public API.

Explore Alternatives

Autify Alternatives

Tools similar to Autify

Devin Alternatives

Tools similar to Devin

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.