Does CodeRabbit or SWE-agent have a free plan?

CodeRabbit is available for free with a free trial. SWE-agent is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

CodeRabbit vs SWE-agent

Q: Can I use CodeRabbit and SWE-agent together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine CodeRabbit and SWE-agent with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated July 2026

CodeRabbit

CodeRabbit Inc

Cut code review time & bugs in half Instantly.

0.0(0)

Freemium

94% verification coverage

SWE-agent

Princeton University

Autonomously fix GitHub issues and perform coding tasks with your preferred language model.

0.0(0)

Open Source

84% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

CodeRabbit

Users:1K-10K

Customers (per vendor):NVIDIA, Abnormal, Ashby +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: CodeRabbit

7.8/10 vs SWE-agent at 6.3/10

Leads in:

Customization

Output Quality

Support

AI Comparison Summary

CodeRabbit

7.8

avg score

SWE-agent

6.3

avg score

CodeRabbit leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Customization and 1 more.

SWE-agent has an edge in Value for Money.

Based on 12 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

CodeRabbit

7.8 / 10

CodeRabbit

Best For

Automating code review processes for development teams

Improving code quality and reducing bugs in software projects

Accelerating pull request cycles for fast-moving teams

Generating comprehensive implementation plans from issues for coding agents

Consider Alternatives If

Non-technical users without coding knowledge

Teams not using Git-based version control systems

Projects that do not require rigorous code quality checks

SWE-agent

Best For

Software developers automating bug fixes

Researchers in AI and software engineering

Cybersecurity professionals for vulnerability detection

Teams solving competitive coding challenges

Consider Alternatives If

Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution

Simple text generation or content creation tasks

Real-time customer support or conversational AI

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

CodeRabbit is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research8.0

SWE-agent is best for

✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0🔍Research7.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

CodeRabbit

Pros

Significantly reduces code review time and effort
Catches complex bugs and edge cases often missed by human reviewers
Provides actionable 1-click and AI-powered fixes
Offers deep context awareness for accurate and relevant feedback
Highly customizable to fit specific coding guidelines and workflows
Integrates seamlessly across major Git platforms, IDEs, and CLI
Continuously learns and improves from team feedback

Cons

Requires developer expertise for advanced configuration via YAML
Full functionality and higher limits are behind paid tiers
May require initial training and feedback to align with specific team preferences
Relies on third-party LLMs (OpenAI, Anthropic) for core AI capabilities
CLI access requires a usage-based add-on for unrestricted use

SWE-agent

Pros

Achieves state-of-the-art performance on SWE-bench
Offers high flexibility with choice of language models
Fully configurable through a single YAML file
Designed for research, making it simple and hackable
Supports multimodal input for processing images in issues
Open-source with an active community

Cons

Currently in maintenance-only mode, superseded by mini-swe-agent
Requires technical expertise for setup and configuration
Performance is dependent on the chosen language model
Not a plug-and-play solution for non-developers
May require human oversight for critical code changes

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Accuracy & Reliability5

Safety & Alignment5

Performance5

Task Completion5

Tool Use Correctness5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

CodeRabbit

7.8

/ 10

Clear winner

SWE-agent

6.3

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

CodeRabbit

7.0▲ +4.0

SWE-agent

3.0

Output Quality

How accurate, reliable, and useful are the outputs this product generates?

CodeRabbit

8.0▲ +1.0

SWE-agent

7.0

Value for Money

How well does the pricing match the features and output quality delivered?

CodeRabbit

7.0

SWE-agent

10.0▲ +3.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

CodeRabbit

9.0▲ +2.0

SWE-agent

7.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

CodeRabbit

8.0▲ +1.0

SWE-agent

7.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

CodeRabbit

8.0▲ +4.0

SWE-agent

4.0

Accuracy & Reliability

Factual accuracy and hallucination resistance

CodeRabbit

—

SWE-agent

—

Safety & Alignment

Calculated

Bias mitigation, content filtering, harmful-output prevention

CodeRabbit

—

SWE-agent

—

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

CodeRabbit

—

SWE-agent

—

Task Completion

End-to-end task success rate

CodeRabbit

—

SWE-agent

—

Tool Use Correctness

Picks the correct tool + correct arguments

CodeRabbit

—

SWE-agent

—

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

CodeRabbit

—

SWE-agent

—

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

CodeRabbit

Task

SWE-agent

2.0

Code Completion

6.0

9.0

Bug Detection

8.0

7.0

Code Explanation

7.0

8.0

Refactoring

7.0

8.0

Test Generation

6.0

7.0

Multi Language Support

5.0

9.0

Context Understanding

8.0

Documentation Generation

7.0

6.0

Performance Optimization

7.0

8.0

Security Scanning

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, CodeRabbit or SWE-agent?

Both are strong options. CodeRabbit has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while SWE-agent has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is CodeRabbit cheaper than SWE-agent?

CodeRabbit starts at free (freemium model) with a free trial. SWE-agent starts at free (open_source model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between CodeRabbit and SWE-agent?

CodeRabbit — "Cut code review time & bugs in half Instantly.". SWE-agent — "Autonomously fix GitHub issues and perform coding tasks with your preferred language model.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use CodeRabbit and SWE-agent together?

Explore Alternatives

CodeRabbit Alternatives

Tools similar to CodeRabbit

SWE-agent Alternatives

Tools similar to SWE-agent

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.