Does Cursor or GitHub Copilot have a free plan?

Cursor is available for free. GitHub Copilot is available for free with a free trial. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot

Q: Can I use Cursor and GitHub Copilot together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Cursor and GitHub Copilot with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Cursor

Anysphere, Inc.

Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.

0.0(0)

G2 4.7★(20)

FREEMIUM

66% data quality

GitHub Copilot

GitHub

Write better code with AI

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

91% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Cursor

Customers (per vendor):Stripe, OpenAI, Datadog +7

GDPR

SOC 2

GitHub Copilot

Overall Winner: Cursor

8.0/10 vs GitHub Copilot at 7.5/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Value for Money

Integrations

AI Comparison Summary

Cursor

8.0

avg score

GitHub Copilot

7.5

avg score

Cursor leads overall — particularly in Output Quality and Integration Power.

GitHub Copilot has an edge in Support & Ecosystem.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Cursor

8.0 / 10

Cursor

Best For

Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance

Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles

Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools

Developers working with complex or large codebases

Not Ideal For

Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment

Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations

Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE

GitHub Copilot

Best For

Developers seeking to accelerate coding

Learning new programming languages or frameworks

Automating repetitive coding tasks

Improving code quality and reducing bugs

Not Ideal For

Developers who prefer to write all code manually

Projects with extremely strict, custom coding standards not understood by AI

Situations requiring offline coding assistance

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Cursor is best for

💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0

GitHub Copilot is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.0🔍Research8.0🎧Customer Support8.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Cursor

Pros

Significantly boosts developer productivity
Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile

Cons

Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product

GitHub Copilot

Pros

Significantly speeds up coding
Reduces boilerplate code
Helps discover new APIs and patterns
Improves code quality and consistency
Integrates seamlessly into popular IDEs
Offers AI-powered chat for coding assistance

Cons

Can sometimes generate incorrect or inefficient code
Requires an active internet connection
May not always understand complex project contexts
Potential for code suggestions to be overly verbose or repetitive

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Cursor

8.0

/ 10

Your pick

GitHub Copilot

7.5

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Cursor

8.0

GitHub Copilot

8.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Cursor

9.0▲ +2.0

GitHub Copilot

7.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Cursor

8.0▲ +1.0

GitHub Copilot

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Cursor

8.0

GitHub Copilot

8.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Cursor

7.0

GitHub Copilot

9.0▲ +2.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Cursor

8.0▲ +2.0

GitHub Copilot

6.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Cursor or GitHub Copilot?

Both are strong options. Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while GitHub Copilot has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Cursor cheaper than GitHub Copilot?

Cursor starts at free (freemium model). GitHub Copilot starts at free (freemium model) with a free trial. Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Cursor and GitHub Copilot?

Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". GitHub Copilot — "Write better code with AI". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Cursor and GitHub Copilot together?

Explore Alternatives

Cursor Alternatives

Tools similar to Cursor

GitHub Copilot Alternatives

Tools similar to GitHub Copilot

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.