Dify vs Langflow

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed October 2026
Dify logo

Dify

LangGenius, Inc.

The Platform for Production-Ready Agentic Workflows

Freemium
86% verification coverage
VS
Langflow logo

Langflow

IBM

Low-code AI builder for agentic and RAG applications

Open Source
79% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Dify

Uptime:99.98%Status page
Users:1M-10M
Customers (per vendor):Maersk, ETS, Anker +1
GDPR
SOC 2

Langflow

Users:100K-1M
Customers (per vendor):BetterUp, WinWeb, Athena Intelligence

Overall Winner: Dify

8.0/10 vs Langflow at 6.7/10

Leads in:
Performance
Ease of Use
Compliance & Data Protection

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Dify

8.0

avg score

Langflow

6.7

avg score

Dify leads overall — particularly in Compliance & Data Protection and Performance.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Dify

8.0 / 10

Dify

Best For
Independent developers building production AI apps
Small teams building production AI apps
Medium-sized teams needing collaboration and higher throughput
Enterprises requiring advanced security, compliance, and dedicated support

Langflow

Best For
Developers accelerating AI workflows
AI development teams building agentic applications
Teams prototyping RAG applications
Engineers deploying AI agents and MCP servers

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Dify is best for

🎨Image & Design8.0🎧Customer Support8.0🤖Automation & Agents6.9

Langflow is best for

💻Coding & Dev7.5🎨Image & Design7.0🤖Automation & Agents6.3

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

DifyDify

Cons

  • App Version Control is listed as 'Coming Soon' for Professional and Team plans.
  • Pay by Invoice via bank transfer is not yet available, only for annual Team subscriptions.
  • Some models cannot be used with message credits and require an own API key.
  • The Sandbox plan has limited message credits, team members, apps, knowledge documents, and data storage.
  • The Sandbox plan has a 30-day log history limit.
  • The Community Edition is for non-commercial projects and complies with Dify Open Source License.
LangflowLangflow

Cons

  • Shareable Playground is not available for Langflow Desktop (docs/concepts-overview)
  • Custom components in publicly shared flows require server-side installation (docs/concepts-playground)
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

Dify

8.0

/ 10

Clear winner

Langflow

6.7

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Dify
7.0▲ +1.0
Langflow
6.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Dify
9.0
Langflow
9.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Dify
10.0
Langflow
10.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Dify
8.0
Langflow
9.0▲ +1.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Dify
6.0▲ +5.0
Langflow
1.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Dify
8.0▲ +3.0
Langflow
5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Dify
—
Langflow
—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Dify

Task

Langflow

6.0
Role Definition
7.0
6.0
Task Decomposition
6.0
7.0
Agent Coordination
7.0
6.0
Inter Agent Communication
6.0
9.0
Workflow Orchestration
8.0
8.0
Tool Use Delegation
8.0
7.0
State Management
6.0
6.0
Error Recovery
4.0
7.0
Observability
7.0
7.0
Scalability Throughput
6.0
9.0
Workflow Building
9.0
8.0
Trigger Variety
5.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Dify and Langflow?
Dify — "The Platform for Production-Ready Agentic Workflows". Langflow — "Low-code AI builder for agentic and RAG applications". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.
Who is Dify best for compared with Langflow?
Dify is best for Independent developers building production AI apps; and for Small teams building production AI apps. Langflow is best for Developers accelerating AI workflows; and for AI development teams building agentic applications.
How does the pricing of Dify compare with Langflow?
Dify is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $59/month. Langflow is open source, includes a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Does Dify or Langflow have a free plan?
Dify has a free plan. Langflow is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Do Dify and Langflow offer an API?
Dify offers a public API. Langflow offers a public API.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.