Gamma vs Beautiful.ai

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed October 2026

Gamma

Gamma Tech, Inc.

Your AI design partner for presentations, websites, and more

Freemium

80% verification coverage

Beautiful.ai

AI presentation software for teams

Paid

79% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Gamma

Uptime:99.92%Status page

Users:100M+

Customers (per vendor):IBM, Mastercard, Novartis +4

GDPR

SOC 2

Beautiful.ai

Uptime:100%Status page

Customers (per vendor):Rakuten, Cvent, Paciolan +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Gamma

6.8/10 vs Beautiful.ai at 5.3/10

Leads in:

Integration

Customization

Ease of Use

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Gamma

6.8

avg score

Beautiful.ai

5.3

avg score

Gamma leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Customization and 1 more.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Gamma

6.8 / 10

Gamma

Best For

Consultants creating client pitches and proposals

Marketing teams generating social media visuals and landing pages

Sales professionals building tailored pitch decks and case studies

Educators creating engaging content for students

Beautiful.ai

Best For

Individuals who need to create professional presentations

Freelancers & agencies managing client pitches and reports

Smaller businesses streamlining presentation creation

Larger enterprises requiring security and brand control

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Gamma is best for

💻Coding & Dev7.5🎬Video7.0🤖Automation & Agents6.8

Beautiful.ai is best for

💻Coding & Dev6.0🎨Image & Design5.4📊Data & Analytics4.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Gamma

Cons

Free plan is capped at 400 credits and 10 slides per prompt
Content may be used to train AI features on Free, Plus, Pro, and Ultra workspaces by default
Screen reader support is a priority but not yet formally audited
Alt text for images is not yet user-editable or AI-suggested
Accessible PPTX and tagged PDF export are still in exploration

Beautiful.ai

Cons

Annual subscriptions may be eligible for a partial refund only if requested within 24 hours of purchase or renewal.
Monthly subscriptions are non-refundable.
Refunds are subject to a processing fee.

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Gamma

6.8

/ 10

Clear winner

Beautiful.ai

5.3

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Gamma

6.0▲ +2.0

Beautiful.ai

4.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Gamma

7.0▲ +4.0

Beautiful.ai

3.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Gamma

6.0

Beautiful.ai

7.0▲ +1.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Gamma

8.0▲ +3.0

Beautiful.ai

5.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Gamma

6.0▲ +1.0

Beautiful.ai

5.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Gamma

8.0

Beautiful.ai

8.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Gamma

—

Beautiful.ai

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Gamma

Task

Beautiful.ai

9.0

Layout Generation

9.0

8.0

Brand Kit Management

8.0

7.0

Template Variety

8.0

7.0

Export Formats

6.0

8.0

Collaboration Tools

8.0

6.0

Typography Handling

6.0

3.0

Icon Design

4.0

8.0

Responsive Design

3.0

6.0

Asset Management

7.0

8.0

Design Consistency

9.0

5.0

Blog Writing

2.0

6.0

Article Generation

3.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Gamma and Beautiful.ai?

Gamma — "Your AI design partner for presentations, websites, and more". Beautiful.ai — "AI presentation software for teams". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Gamma best for compared with Beautiful.ai?

Gamma is best for Consultants creating client pitches and proposals; and for Marketing teams generating social media visuals and landing pages. Beautiful.ai is best for Individuals who need to create professional presentations; and for Freelancers & agencies managing client pitches and reports.

How does the pricing of Gamma compare with Beautiful.ai?

Gamma is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $9/month. Beautiful.ai is paid, paid plans start at $45/month, offers a free trial. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Gamma or Beautiful.ai have a free plan?

Gamma has a free plan. Beautiful.ai lists no free plan and offers a free trial. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Explore Alternatives

Gamma Alternatives

Tools similar to Gamma

Beautiful.ai Alternatives

Tools similar to Beautiful.ai

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.