Gamma vs Pitch

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed October 2026

Gamma

Gamma Tech, Inc.

Your AI design partner for presentations, websites, and more

Freemium

80% verification coverage

Pitch

Pitch Software GmbH

The AI presentation workspace

Freemium

74% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Gamma

Uptime:99.92%Status page

Users:100M+

Customers (per vendor):IBM, Mastercard, Novartis +4

GDPR

SOC 2

Pitch

Users:1M-10M

Customers (per vendor):Pentagram, Ogilvy, Legora +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Too Close to Call

Gamma (6.8) vs Pitch (6.7) — difference of 0.2 points

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Gamma

6.8

avg score

Pitch

6.7

avg score

Both tools score very similarly overall — the best choice depends on your specific priorities.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Too close to call — it's a tie

Gamma

Best For

Consultants creating client pitches and proposals

Marketing teams generating social media visuals and landing pages

Sales professionals building tailored pitch decks and case studies

Educators creating engaging content for students

Pitch

Best For

Sales teams closing deals with personalized decks

Marketing teams maintaining brand consistency at scale

Creative agencies designing sleek presentations

Customer success teams onboarding and retaining clients

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Gamma is best for

💻Coding & Dev7.5🎬Video7.0🤖Automation & Agents6.8

Pitch is best for

🤖Automation & Agents5.4💻Coding & Dev4.5🎨Image & Design4.3

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Gamma

Cons

Free plan is capped at 400 credits and 10 slides per prompt
Content may be used to train AI features on Free, Plus, Pro, and Ultra workspaces by default
Screen reader support is a priority but not yet formally audited
Alt text for images is not yet user-editable or AI-suggested
Accessible PPTX and tagged PDF export are still in exploration

Pitch

Cons

Free plan AI credits do not renew
Free plan has limited external guests (2)
Free plan has basic sharing links without engagement analytics
Free plan has branded PDF exports
Free plan has no PowerPoint exports
Free plan has no video uploads
Free plan has no offline access
Free plan has no version history

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Gamma

6.8

/ 10

Your pick

Pitch

6.7

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Gamma

6.0

Pitch

6.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Gamma

7.0▲ +1.0

Pitch

6.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Gamma

6.0

Pitch

7.0▲ +1.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Gamma

8.0

Pitch

8.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Gamma

6.0▲ +1.0

Pitch

5.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Gamma

8.0

Pitch

8.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Gamma

—

Pitch

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Gamma

Task

Pitch

9.0

Layout Generation

7.0

8.0

Brand Kit Management

7.0

Template Variety

7.0

Export Formats

6.0

8.0

Collaboration Tools

9.0

6.0

Typography Handling

7.0

3.0

Icon Design

3.0

8.0

Responsive Design

4.0

6.0

Asset Management

7.0

8.0

Design Consistency

8.0

5.0

Blog Writing

2.0

6.0

Article Generation

2.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Gamma and Pitch?

Gamma — "Your AI design partner for presentations, websites, and more". Pitch — "The AI presentation workspace". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Gamma best for compared with Pitch?

Gamma is best for Consultants creating client pitches and proposals; and for Marketing teams generating social media visuals and landing pages. Pitch is best for Sales teams closing deals with personalized decks; and for Marketing teams maintaining brand consistency at scale.

How does the pricing of Gamma compare with Pitch?

Gamma is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $9/month. Pitch is freemium, includes a free plan, offers a free trial. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Gamma or Pitch have a free plan?

Gamma has a free plan. Pitch has a free plan and offers a free trial. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Do Gamma and Pitch offer an API?

Gamma offers a public API. Pitch offers a public API.

Explore Alternatives

Gamma Alternatives

Tools similar to Gamma

Pitch Alternatives

Tools similar to Pitch

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.