Google ADK vs Dify

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed October 2026

Google ADK

Google

Build production agents, not prototypes.

Open Source

75% verification coverage

Dify

LangGenius, Inc.

The Platform for Production-Ready Agentic Workflows

Freemium

86% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Google ADK

Customers (per vendor):Revionics

Dify

Uptime:99.98%Status page

Users:1M-10M

Customers (per vendor):Maersk, ETS, Anker +1

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Dify

8.0/10 vs Google ADK at 5.3/10

Leads in:

Support

Customization

Performance

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Google ADK

5.3

avg score

Dify

8.0

avg score

Dify leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Support and 2 more.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Dify

8.0 / 10

Google ADK

Best For

Developers building AI agents

Enterprises deploying AI agents at scale

Teams needing reliable AI agent workflows

Dify

Best For

Independent developers building production AI apps

Small teams building production AI apps

Medium-sized teams needing collaboration and higher throughput

Enterprises requiring advanced security, compliance, and dedicated support

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Google ADK is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.8🎧Customer Support6.0📊Data & Analytics5.0

Dify is best for

🎨Image & Design8.0🎧Customer Support8.0🤖Automation & Agents6.9

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Google ADK

Cons

Requires Python 3.10+ or Java 17+ for certain runtime requirements
Deployment to production requires synchronous definition of McpToolset in agent.py
Does not automatically re-establish active MCP connections upon session restoration

Dify

Cons

App Version Control is listed as 'Coming Soon' for Professional and Team plans.
Pay by Invoice via bank transfer is not yet available, only for annual Team subscriptions.
Some models cannot be used with message credits and require an own API key.
The Sandbox plan has limited message credits, team members, apps, knowledge documents, and data storage.
The Sandbox plan has a 30-day log history limit.
The Community Edition is for non-commercial projects and complies with Dify Open Source License.

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Google ADK

5.3

/ 10

Dify

8.0

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Google ADK

2.0

Dify

7.0▲ +5.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Google ADK

8.0

Dify

9.0▲ +1.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Google ADK

8.0

Dify

10.0▲ +2.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Google ADK

8.0

Dify

8.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Google ADK

1.0

Dify

6.0▲ +5.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Google ADK

5.0

Dify

8.0▲ +3.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Google ADK

—

Dify

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Google ADK

Task

Dify

8.0

Role Definition

6.0

7.0

Task Decomposition

6.0

9.0

Agent Coordination

7.0

8.0

Inter Agent Communication

6.0

9.0

Workflow Orchestration

9.0

8.0

Tool Use Delegation

8.0

State Management

7.0

Error Recovery

6.0

8.0

Observability

7.0

Scalability Throughput

7.0

8.0

Task Delegation

6.0

8.0

Parallel Execution

7.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Google ADK and Dify?

Google ADK — "Build production agents, not prototypes". Dify — "The Platform for Production-Ready Agentic Workflows". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Google ADK best for compared with Dify?

Google ADK is best for Developers building AI agents; and for Enterprises deploying AI agents at scale. Dify is best for Independent developers building production AI apps; and for Small teams building production AI apps.

How does the pricing of Google ADK compare with Dify?

Google ADK is open source, includes a free plan. Dify is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $59/month. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Google ADK or Dify have a free plan?

Google ADK is open source. Dify has a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Do Google ADK and Dify offer an API?

Google ADK offers a public API. Dify offers a public API.

Explore Alternatives

Google ADK Alternatives

Tools similar to Google ADK

Dify Alternatives

Tools similar to Dify

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.