Google ADK vs LlamaIndex

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed October 2026

Google ADK

Google

Build production agents, not prototypes.

Open Source

75% verification coverage

LlamaIndex

LlamaIndex Inc.

AI Agents for Document OCR + Workflows

Freemium

82% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Google ADK

Customers (per vendor):Revionics

LlamaIndex

Uptime:99.99%Status page

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):Jeppesen (a Boeing Company), NTT Data, Carlyle

GDPR

SOC 2

HIPAA

Overall Winner: LlamaIndex

6.8/10 vs Google ADK at 5.3/10

Leads in:

Customization

Support

Compliance & Data Protection

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Google ADK

5.3

avg score

LlamaIndex

6.8

avg score

LlamaIndex leads overall — particularly in Customization and Support and 1 more.

Google ADK has an edge in Integration.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

LlamaIndex

6.8 / 10

Google ADK

Best For

Developers building AI agents

Enterprises deploying AI agents at scale

Teams needing reliable AI agent workflows

LlamaIndex

Best For

Engineering and R&D teams accelerating product development

Administrative operations streamlining business processes

Financial analysts building AI-powered financial models

Insurance companies automating claims and underwriting

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Google ADK is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.8🎧Customer Support6.0📊Data & Analytics5.0

LlamaIndex is best for

✍️Writing & Content7.0🤖Automation & Agents6.2🔍Research5.8

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Google ADK

Cons

Requires Python 3.10+ or Java 17+ for certain runtime requirements
Deployment to production requires synchronous definition of McpToolset in agent.py
Does not automatically re-establish active MCP connections upon session restoration

LlamaIndex

Cons

LlamaParse is a commercial platform and not open source, though LlamaIndex and Workflows are open source projects.
Bonus credits on the Pro plan expire immediately upon downgrade and require a business email domain.

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Google ADK

5.3

/ 10

LlamaIndex

6.8

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Google ADK

2.0

LlamaIndex

3.0▲ +1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Google ADK

8.0

LlamaIndex

10.0▲ +2.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Google ADK

8.0

LlamaIndex

10.0▲ +2.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Google ADK

8.0▲ +3.0

LlamaIndex

5.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Google ADK

1.0

LlamaIndex

8.0▲ +7.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Google ADK

5.0

LlamaIndex

5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Google ADK

—

LlamaIndex

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Google ADK

Task

LlamaIndex

8.0

Role Definition

6.0

7.0

Task Decomposition

6.0

9.0

Agent Coordination

6.0

8.0

Inter Agent Communication

5.0

9.0

Workflow Orchestration

8.0

Tool Use Delegation

7.0

8.0

State Management

7.0

Error Recovery

6.0

8.0

Observability

7.0

Scalability Throughput

7.0

8.0

Task Delegation

6.0

8.0

Parallel Execution

6.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Google ADK and LlamaIndex?

Google ADK — "Build production agents, not prototypes". LlamaIndex — "AI Agents for Document OCR + Workflows". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Google ADK best for compared with LlamaIndex?

Google ADK is best for Developers building AI agents; and for Enterprises deploying AI agents at scale. LlamaIndex is best for Engineering and R&D teams accelerating product development; and for Administrative operations streamlining business processes.

How does the pricing of Google ADK compare with LlamaIndex?

Google ADK is open source, includes a free plan. LlamaIndex is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $50/month. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Google ADK or LlamaIndex have a free plan?

Google ADK is open source. LlamaIndex has a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Do Google ADK and LlamaIndex offer an API?

Google ADK offers a public API. LlamaIndex offers a public API.

Explore Alternatives

Google ADK Alternatives

Tools similar to Google ADK

LlamaIndex Alternatives

Tools similar to LlamaIndex

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.