Kilo Code vs Onlook

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed October 2026

Kilo Code

Kilo Code, Inc.

One open agent for every developer workflow

Freemium

83% verification coverage

Onlook

On Off, Inc.

The Developer Tool for Designers.

Freemium

69% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Kilo Code

Users:1M-10M

Customers (per vendor):Ida Infront, Plug&Pay, Dona Dowlan +2

SOC 2

Onlook

Users:10K-100K

Overall Winner: Kilo Code

6.3/10 vs Onlook at 5.2/10

Leads in:

Support

Customization

Integration

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Kilo Code

6.3

avg score

Onlook

5.2

avg score

Kilo Code leads overall — particularly in Customization and Support and 2 more.

Onlook has an edge in Ease of Use.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Kilo Code

6.3 / 10

Kilo Code

Best For

Developers seeking an open-source AI coding agent across multiple platforms

Engineering teams needing shared billing, analytics, and consistent agent setup

Organizations requiring governance, security review, and SLAs for AI coding

Power users who want predictable monthly AI spending

Onlook

Best For

Designers working with React codebases

Product teams aiming to bridge design and engineering workflows

Developers seeking transparency and flexibility in design tools

Teams prototyping and building websites with AI assistance

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Kilo Code is best for

✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0🔍Research7.0

Onlook is best for

✍️Writing & Content7.0💬Chat & Conversation7.0🎨Image & Design5.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

Kilo Code

Cons

Bonus credits for Kilo Pass expire at the end of each month
Kilo Pass renewals and later plan changes do not generate additional affiliate commissions
Paid and search-engine traffic is restricted for the affiliate program
Data already shared with third-party AI providers is governed by their retention policies
Sentry retention varies by data type and plan, generally 30-90 days
AppsFlyer user-level raw data retention is typically 90 days, aggregated data up to 25 months
Kilo Code does not intentionally collect sensitive or special category personal information

Onlook

Cons

Currently in closed beta
Hosted cloud version requires contacting the team for pricing

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Kilo Code

6.3

/ 10

Clear winner

Onlook

5.2

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Kilo Code

1.0

Onlook

6.0▲ +5.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Kilo Code

9.0▲ +4.0

Onlook

5.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Kilo Code

10.0▲ +3.0

Onlook

7.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Kilo Code

7.0▲ +3.0

Onlook

4.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Kilo Code

3.0▲ +2.0

Onlook

1.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Kilo Code

8.0

Onlook

8.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Kilo Code

—

Onlook

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Kilo Code

Task

Onlook

7.0

Code Completion

3.0

7.0

Bug Detection

3.0

8.0

Code Explanation

4.0

7.0

Refactoring

4.0

6.0

Test Generation

2.0

7.0

Multi Language Support

3.0

8.0

Context Understanding

7.0

5.0

Documentation Generation

2.0

4.0

Performance Optimization

2.0

7.0

Security Scanning

1.0

4.0

Api Management

1.0

6.0

Ci Cd Integration

3.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Kilo Code and Onlook?

Kilo Code — "One open agent for every developer workflow". Onlook — "The Developer Tool for Designers". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is Kilo Code best for compared with Onlook?

Kilo Code is best for Developers seeking an open-source AI coding agent across multiple platforms; and for Engineering teams needing shared billing, analytics, and consistent agent setup. Onlook is best for Designers working with React codebases; and for Product teams aiming to bridge design and engineering workflows.

How does the pricing of Kilo Code compare with Onlook?

Kilo Code is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $19/month, offers a free trial. Onlook is freemium, includes a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does Kilo Code or Onlook have a free plan?

Kilo Code has a free plan and offers a free trial. Onlook has a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Explore Alternatives

Kilo Code Alternatives

Tools similar to Kilo Code

Onlook Alternatives

Tools similar to Onlook

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.