LangGraph vs openteams

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026

LangGraph

LangChain

Agent orchestration framework for reliable AI agents

Open Source

80% verification coverage

openteams

openteams-lab

Build and ship your indie software faster with an AI team.

Open Source

71% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

LangGraph

Uptime:99.93%Status page

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):Klarna, Vanta, Rippling +7

GDPR

SOC 2

HIPAA

openteams

Trust data not available yet

Overall Winner: LangGraph

6.9/10 vs openteams at 4.9/10

Leads in:

Customization

Support

Compliance & Data Protection

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

LangGraph

6.9

avg score

openteams

4.9

avg score

LangGraph leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Customization and 2 more.

Based on 7 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

LangGraph

6.9 / 10

LangGraph

Best For

Developers building AI agents who need low-level control

Engineering teams building stateful, multi-actor LLM applications

Developers who need human-in-the-loop moderation and control over an agent's execution

Teams needing to debug and monitor agent runs with detailed step-by-step tracing

openteams

Best For

Indie developers building software with AI teams

Developers managing complex multi-agent workflows

Teams needing isolated execution environments for code changes

Developers tracking project progress and build statistics

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

LangGraph is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.5📊Data & Analytics7.0💻Coding & Dev6.0

openteams is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.5✍️Writing & Content7.0💬Chat & Conversation7.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

LangGraph

Cons

No cons listed yet.

openteams

Cons

macOS release is not signed or notarized by Apple; Gatekeeper may report the app as damaged until you run xattr -dr com.apple.quarantine

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

LangGraph

6.9

/ 10

Clear winner

openteams

4.9

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

LangGraph

3.0▲ +2.0

openteams

1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

LangGraph

10.0▲ +5.0

openteams

5.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

LangGraph

10.0▲ +3.0

openteams

7.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

LangGraph

4.0▲ +1.0

openteams

3.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

LangGraph

8.0▲ +3.0

openteams

5.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

LangGraph

5.0

openteams

5.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

LangGraph

8.0

openteams

8.0

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

LangGraph

Task

openteams

4.0

Role Definition

9.0

6.0

Task Decomposition

8.0

Agent Coordination

8.0

7.0

Inter Agent Communication

7.0

9.0

Workflow Orchestration

8.0

7.0

Tool Use Delegation

6.0

10.0

State Management

7.0

8.0

Error Recovery

7.0

9.0

Observability

8.0

7.0

Scalability Throughput

6.0

7.0

Task Delegation

8.0

7.0

Parallel Execution

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between LangGraph and openteams?

LangGraph — "Agent orchestration framework for reliable AI agents". openteams — "Build and ship your indie software faster with an AI team". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is LangGraph best for compared with openteams?

LangGraph is best for Developers building AI agents who need low-level control; and for Engineering teams building stateful, multi-actor LLM applications. openteams is best for Indie developers building software with AI teams; and for Developers managing complex multi-agent workflows.

How does the pricing of LangGraph compare with openteams?

LangGraph is open source, includes a free plan. openteams is open source, includes a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does LangGraph or openteams have a free plan?

LangGraph is open source. openteams is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Explore Alternatives

LangGraph Alternatives

Tools similar to LangGraph

openteams Alternatives

Tools similar to openteams

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.