Lilt vs Translated
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated May 2026
Trust & Reliability
Too Close to Call
Translated (7.3) vs Lilt (7.2) — difference of 0.2 points
AI Comparison Summary
Lilt
7.2
avg score
Translated
7.3
avg score
Translated leads overall.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Translated
7.3 / 10
Lilt
Best For
Orchestrating enterprise localization programs
Developing multilingual AI models and evaluating performance
Launching products and campaigns in global markets
Translating technical documentation with accuracy
Not Ideal For
Individual users or small businesses needing simple, ad-hoc translations.
Users seeking a free or low-cost translation solution.
Teams without existing content management systems or complex localization needs.
Translated
Best For
Embedding professional translation into products and localization workflows
Automating content localization for global enterprises
Translating legal and technical documents with high precision
Scaling localized content marketing and advertising
Not Ideal For
Individuals needing free, instant, unverified translations for personal use
Users who prefer purely human translation without any AI involvement
Small, one-off personal translation tasks without professional requirements
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Lilt is best for
✍️Writing & Content7.0🔍Research7.0
Translated is best for
🔍Research7.0✍️Writing & Content6.7
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
LiltPros
- Scales multilingual content production for global markets rapidly
- Accelerates AI transformation with smarter, domain-specific models
- Ensures brand, legal, and regulatory compliance with secure communication
- Leverages a network of specialized domain experts for accuracy and consistency
- Offers custom and BYO AI models, including Gemini, GPT-4, and GPT-5
- Provides 100+ native integrations and robust APIs for existing tech stacks
Cons
- Pricing is enterprise-only, requiring custom quotes and contact with sales.
- No transparent pricing or free tier available for individual users or small businesses.
- Requires integration with existing content management systems for full benefit.
- Primarily targets large organizations, potentially over-engineered for smaller teams.
- No explicit mention of offline mode for translation work.
TranslatedPros
- Combines advanced AI (Lara, ModernMT) with a vast network of human experts
- Supports over 200 languages for broad global reach
- Offers comprehensive APIs and numerous native CMS/TMS integrations
- Provides adaptive machine translation that learns in real-time
- Trusted by major global brands for critical localization needs
- Guarantees quality control with real-time checks and professional revisers
Cons
- Human translation services can be more costly than purely machine translation, especially for specialized content.
- Turnaround times for large or highly complex projects requiring human translation can be significant.
- The quality of the translation is highly dependent on the clarity and accuracy of the provided source text.
- While AI is used, it may struggle with highly nuanced, creative, or culturally specific content compared to expert human translators.
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Lilt
7.2
/ 10
Translated
7.3
/ 10
Your pick
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Lilt
6.0
Translated
7.0▲ +1.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Lilt
9.0
Translated
9.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Lilt
7.0
Translated
7.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Lilt
6.0▲ +1.0
Translated
5.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Lilt
7.0
Translated
8.0▲ +1.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Lilt
8.0
Translated
8.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Task Performance
Lilt
Task
Translated
7.07.0
Text Summarization
10.010.0
Language Translation
8.08.0
Grammar Correction
7.07.0
Paraphrasing
7.06.0
Readability Improvement
6.07.0
Format Conversion
7.07.0
Keyword Extraction
5.06.0
Sentiment Detection
6.05.0
Text Comparison
8.08.0
Batch Processing
* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Lilt or Translated?
Both are strong options. Lilt has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Translated has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Lilt cheaper than Translated?
Lilt starts at free (enterprise model). Translated starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Lilt and Translated?
Lilt — "Make anything multilingual with AI-powered enterprise localization.". Translated — "Open up language to everyone with AI-driven professional translation services.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.