LlamaIndex vs Agno

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026

LlamaIndex

LlamaIndex Inc.

AI Agents for Document OCR + Workflows

Freemium

82% verification coverage

Agno

Agno Inc.

Agent framework & high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems

Open Source

86% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

LlamaIndex

Uptime:99.99%Status page

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):Jeppesen (a Boeing Company), NTT Data, Carlyle

GDPR

SOC 2

HIPAA

Agno

Uptime:100%Status page

Users:10K-100K

Customers (per vendor):Key Data, The Kiln, Thinqpoint +2

Overall Winner: LlamaIndex

6.8/10 vs Agno at 6.3/10

Leads in:

Customization

Compliance & Data Protection

Ease of Use

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

LlamaIndex

6.8

avg score

Agno

6.3

avg score

LlamaIndex leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Compliance & Data Protection.

Agno has an edge in Integration and Performance.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

LlamaIndex

6.8 / 10

LlamaIndex

Best For

Engineering and R&D teams accelerating product development

Administrative operations streamlining business processes

Financial analysts building AI-powered financial models

Insurance companies automating claims and underwriting

Agno

Best For

Engineering teams building custom AI agent platforms for internal use

Developers needing a flexible, high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems

Companies requiring full data privacy and control over their AI infrastructure

Companies running their agent platform in their own cloud

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

LlamaIndex is best for

✍️Writing & Content7.0🤖Automation & Agents6.2🔍Research5.8

Agno is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.2💻Coding & Dev8.0📊Data & Analytics8.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

LlamaIndex

Cons

LlamaParse is a commercial platform and not open source, though LlamaIndex and Workflows are open source projects.
Bonus credits on the Pro plan expire immediately upon downgrade and require a business email domain.

Agno

Cons

Agents, teams and workflows are written in Python
SAML SSO is a paid add-on ($300/mo) rather than an included feature

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Compliance & Data Protection5

Performance5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

LlamaIndex

6.8

/ 10

Your pick

Agno

6.3

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

LlamaIndex

3.0▲ +2.0

Agno

1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

LlamaIndex

10.0▲ +1.0

Agno

9.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

LlamaIndex

10.0

Agno

10.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

LlamaIndex

5.0

Agno

8.0▲ +3.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

LlamaIndex

8.0▲ +6.0

Agno

2.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

LlamaIndex

5.0

Agno

8.0▲ +3.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

LlamaIndex

—

Agno

—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

LlamaIndex

Task

Agno

6.0

Role Definition

8.0

6.0

Task Decomposition

8.0

6.0

Agent Coordination

9.0

5.0

Inter Agent Communication

8.0

Workflow Orchestration

9.0

7.0

Tool Use Delegation

8.0

7.0

State Management

9.0

6.0

Error Recovery

9.0

7.0

Observability

9.0

7.0

Scalability Throughput

9.0

8.0

Workflow Building

7.0

4.0

Trigger Variety

6.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between LlamaIndex and Agno?

LlamaIndex — "AI Agents for Document OCR + Workflows". Agno — "Agent framework & high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.

Who is LlamaIndex best for compared with Agno?

LlamaIndex is best for Engineering and R&D teams accelerating product development; and for Administrative operations streamlining business processes. Agno is best for Engineering teams building custom AI agent platforms for internal use; and for Developers needing a flexible, high-performance runtime for multi-agent systems.

How does the pricing of LlamaIndex compare with Agno?

LlamaIndex is freemium, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $50/month. Agno is open source, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $150/month. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Does LlamaIndex or Agno have a free plan?

LlamaIndex has a free plan. Agno is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Do LlamaIndex and Agno offer an API?

LlamaIndex offers a public API. Agno offers a public API.

Explore Alternatives

LlamaIndex Alternatives

Tools similar to LlamaIndex

Agno Alternatives

Tools similar to Agno

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.