Does Make or n8n have a free plan?

Make is available for free. n8n is available for free with a free trial. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Make vs n8n

Q: Can I use Make and n8n together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Make and n8n with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

Make

Celonis, Inc.

Visually build and orchestrate AI automation with speed and control

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

96% verification coverage

n8n

n8n GmbH

AI agents and workflows you can see and control

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

83% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Make

Uptime:99.99%Status page

Users:10K-100K

Customers (per vendor):Globant, Celonis, FranklinCovey +7

GDPR

Too Close to Call

Make (8.2) vs n8n (7.8) — difference of 0.4 points

AI Comparison Summary

Make

8.2

avg score

n8n

7.8

avg score

Make leads overall — particularly in Value for Money and Support.

n8n has an edge in Customization and Integration.

Based on 12 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Make

8.2 / 10

Make

Best For

Building no-code AI automation workflows for business users

Orchestrating complex multi-app processes for operations teams

Integrating AI into existing business applications

Scaling automation across enterprise departments

Not Ideal For

Deep code-level customization for highly specific integrations

Users who prefer code-first development environments

Simple, single-step automations where a lightweight tool suffices

n8n

Best For

Technical teams building complex AI agents and automation workflows across diverse applications

Enterprises needing robust security, compliance, and governance for their automation infrastructure

Developers who require both visual building and custom code flexibility for rapid prototyping and production deployment

Organizations looking to self-host their automation platform for data privacy and control

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking purely no-code, drag-and-drop automation without any coding flexibility

Individuals or small teams with no budget for paid plans who require cloud-hosted features beyond the free self-hosted option

Users who need a simple, single-purpose integration tool without complex workflow logic

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Make is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.7

n8n is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Make

Pros

Visual-first no-code builder for rapid development
Extensive library of 3,000+ pre-built app integrations
Supports autonomous AI agents for dynamic task execution
Real-time visual map provides clarity and control over automations
Strong security and compliance (GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SSO)
Free plan available with no time limit or credit card required

Cons

May have a learning curve for designing complex scenarios
Reliance on pre-built app connectors for non-API integrations
Advanced custom logic might require workarounds or custom app development

n8n

Pros

Combines visual workflow building with custom JavaScript/Python code nodes
Supports over 500 integrations and custom API connections
Offers self-hosting options for on-premise deployment and air-gapped networks
Provides robust enterprise features like SSO, RBAC, Git-based version control, and audit logs
Enables building and testing of AI agents with human-in-the-loop and guardrails
Free Community Edition available with full source code access

Cons

Requires some technical knowledge for advanced customization and self-hosting
Dedicated support with SLA is only available on the Enterprise plan
Cloud plans have limits on workflow executions, saved executions, and data retention
Business plan free trial requires a credit card
AI Workflow Builder credits are limited on lower tiers

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customization5

Support5

Integration5

Accuracy & Reliability5

Safety & Alignment5

Performance5

Task Completion5

Tool Use Correctness5

Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Make

8.2

/ 10

Your pick

n8n

7.8

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Make

7.0▲ +1.0

n8n

6.0

Output Quality

How accurate, reliable, and useful are the outputs this product generates?

Make

8.0

n8n

8.0

Value for Money

How well does the pricing match the features and output quality delivered?

Make

9.0▲ +2.0

n8n

7.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Make

8.0

n8n

10.0▲ +2.0

Support

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Make

9.0▲ +2.0

n8n

7.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Make

8.0

n8n

10.0▲ +2.0

Accuracy & Reliability

Factual accuracy and hallucination resistance

Make

—

n8n

8.0

Safety & Alignment

Calculated

Bias mitigation, content filtering, harmful-output prevention

Make

—

n8n

6.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Make

—

n8n

8.0

Task Completion

End-to-end task success rate

Make

—

n8n

—

Tool Use Correctness

Picks the correct tool + correct arguments

Make

—

n8n

—

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Make

—

n8n

—

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Make

Task

n8n

9.0

Workflow Building

9.0

8.0

Trigger Variety

7.0

10.0

Action Library

9.0

8.0

Error Handling

8.0

7.0

Scheduling Capability

8.0

Conditional Logic

8.0

9.0

Api Connectivity

9.0

8.0

Monitoring Logging

8.0

9.0

Multi Step Chains

9.0

8.0

Autonomous Execution

7.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Make or n8n?

Both are strong options. Make has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while n8n has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Make cheaper than n8n?

Make starts at free (freemium model). n8n starts at free (freemium model) with a free trial. Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Make and n8n?

Make — "Visually build and orchestrate AI automation with speed and control". n8n — "AI agents and workflows you can see and control". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Make and n8n together?

Explore Alternatives

Make Alternatives

Tools similar to Make

n8n Alternatives

Tools similar to n8n

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.