n8n vs Make

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated April 2026

n8n

n8n GmbH

Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams.

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Make

Celonis, Inc.

Visually build and orchestrate AI automation with speed and control

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

96% data quality

Trust & Reliability

n8n

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):Wayfair, Vodafone, Unbabel +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Make

Uptime:99.99%Status page

Users:10K-100K

Customers (per vendor):Globant, Celonis, FranklinCovey +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Too Close to Call

Make (8.2) vs n8n (7.8) — difference of 0.3 points

AI Comparison Summary

n8n

7.8

avg score

Make

8.2

avg score

Make leads overall — particularly in Value for Money.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Make

8.2 / 10

n8n

Best For

Technical teams building complex AI agents

Developers needing flexible automation with code fallback

Organizations requiring on-premise data control and security

IT and Security Operations for automating incident response

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking purely no-code

simple automations

Individuals unwilling to manage self-hosted infrastructure

Make

Best For

Building no-code AI automation workflows for business users

Orchestrating complex multi-app processes for operations teams

Integrating AI into existing business applications

Scaling automation across enterprise departments

Not Ideal For

Deep code-level customization for highly specific integrations

Users who prefer code-first development environments

Simple, single-step automations where a lightweight tool suffices

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

n8n is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Make is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.7

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

n8n

Pros

Highly flexible with both visual and code-based building
Extensive library of integrations (over 500)
Open-source and self-hostable for maximum control and data privacy
Strong debugging and monitoring features
Supports advanced enterprise security and collaboration (SSO
RBAC
Git)
Powerful for building multi-step AI agents and RAG systems

Cons

Requires some technical knowledge for advanced use cases
Self-hosting requires infrastructure management
Dedicated support only available on Enterprise plan
Pricing based on executions can be less predictable for very high-volume
simple tasks compared to per-step models

Make

Pros

Visual-first no-code builder for rapid development
Extensive library of 3,000+ pre-built app integrations
Supports autonomous AI agents for dynamic task execution
Real-time visual map provides clarity and control over automations
Strong security and compliance (GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SSO)
Free plan available with no time limit or credit card required

Cons

May have a learning curve for designing complex scenarios
Reliance on pre-built app connectors for non-API integrations
Advanced custom logic might require workarounds or custom app development

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

n8n

7.8

/ 10

Make

8.2

/ 10

Your pick

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

n8n

7.0

Make

7.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

n8n

8.0

Make

8.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

n8n

7.0

Make

9.0▲ +2.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

n8n

9.0▲ +1.0

Make

8.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

n8n

8.0

Make

9.0▲ +1.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

n8n

8.0

Make

8.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

n8n

Task

Make

9.0

Workflow Building

9.0

8.0

Trigger Variety

8.0

9.0

Action Library

10.0

7.0

Error Handling

8.0

Scheduling Capability

7.0

8.0

Conditional Logic

8.0

9.0

Api Connectivity

9.0

8.0

Monitoring Logging

8.0

9.0

Multi Step Chains

9.0

7.0

Autonomous Execution

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, n8n or Make?

Both are strong options. n8n has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Make has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is n8n cheaper than Make?

n8n starts at $20/month (freemium model) with a free trial. Make starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between n8n and Make?

n8n — "Flexible AI workflow automation for technical teams.". Make — "Visually build and orchestrate AI automation with speed and control". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use n8n and Make together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine n8n and Make with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Does n8n or Make have a free plan?

n8n is available for free with a free trial. Make is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Explore Alternatives

n8n Alternatives

Tools similar to n8n

Make Alternatives

Tools similar to Make

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.