OutSystems vs Agenta

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026
OutSystems logo

OutSystems

OutSystems

Your AI development platform built for the enterprise.

Freemium
76% verification coverage
VS
Agenta logo

Agenta

Agentatech UG

The open-source workspace for your agents

Open Source
81% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

OutSystems

Users:500K-1M
Customers (per vendor):Honda, HEINEKEN, Thermo Fisher +4
GDPR
SOC 2
HIPAA

Agenta

GDPR
SOC 2

Overall Winner: Agenta

7.7/10 vs OutSystems at 4.5/10

Leads in:
Customization
Integration
Support

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

OutSystems

4.5

avg score

Agenta

7.7

avg score

Agenta leads overall — particularly in Customization and Support and 2 more.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Agenta

7.7 / 10

OutSystems

Best For
Regulated enterprises modernizing legacy systems
Teams building custom AI applications and agents
Organizations needing enterprise-grade security and governance for AI
Businesses automating complex internal workflows

Agenta

Best For
Engineering teams building code review or operations agents with full control over their stack
Product teams automating research and reporting workflows with human oversight
Teams running AI agents on their own infrastructure
Organizations requiring robust governance and compliance for AI automation

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

OutSystems is best for

🎨Image & Design9.0📊Data & Analytics9.0✍️Writing & Content8.0

Agenta is best for

🤖Automation & Agents4.7📊Data & Analytics4.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

OutSystemsOutSystems

Cons

  • Pricing is custom and requires contacting sales for most tiers.
  • Compliance options are limited to ISO 27001 on the standard platform, with additional certifications available as add-ons.
  • Uptime guarantee is 99.5% on the standard platform, with an upgrade to 99.95% available as an add-on.
  • Application end-users start with 100 internal users, with additional users requiring add-ons.
AgentaAgenta

Cons

  • Cloud Hobby plan limits team members to two and trace data retention to one week
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

OutSystems

4.5

/ 10

Agenta

7.7

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

OutSystems
3.0
Agenta
4.0▲ +1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

OutSystems
4.0
Agenta
10.0▲ +6.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

OutSystems
5.0
Agenta
8.0▲ +3.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

OutSystems
4.0
Agenta
9.0▲ +5.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

OutSystems
6.0
Agenta
7.0▲ +1.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

OutSystems
5.0
Agenta
8.0▲ +3.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

OutSystems
—
Agenta
—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

OutSystems

Task

Agenta

7.0
Role Definition
6.0
6.0
Task Decomposition
4.0
8.0
Agent Coordination
3.0
6.0
Inter Agent Communication
2.0
9.0
Workflow Orchestration
8.0
7.0
Tool Use Delegation
8.0
7.0
State Management
6.0
5.0
Error Recovery
4.0
8.0
Observability
9.0
7.0
Scalability Throughput
3.0
7.0
Task Delegation
4.0
5.0
Parallel Execution
3.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between OutSystems and Agenta?
OutSystems — "Your AI development platform built for the enterprise". Agenta — "The open-source workspace for your agents". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.
Who is OutSystems best for compared with Agenta?
OutSystems is best for Regulated enterprises modernizing legacy systems; and for Teams building custom AI applications and agents. Agenta is best for Engineering teams building code review or operations agents with full control over their stack; and for Product teams automating research and reporting workflows with human oversight.
How does the pricing of OutSystems compare with Agenta?
OutSystems is freemium, includes a free plan. Agenta is open source, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $29/month. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Does OutSystems or Agenta have a free plan?
OutSystems has a free plan. Agenta is open source. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.