Qodo vs Cursor
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated May 2026
Trust & Reliability
Qodo
Users:1M-10M
Customers (per vendor):Intel, Hi Bob, Inc., Percepto +7
SOC 2
Cursor
Too Close to Call
Cursor (8.0) vs Qodo (7.7) — difference of 0.3 points
AI Comparison Summary
Qodo
7.7
avg score
Cursor
8.0
avg score
Cursor leads overall.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Cursor
8.0 / 10
Qodo
Best For
Automating code reviews for large engineering teams
Enforcing coding standards and compliance across distributed systems
Reducing pull request backlogs and accelerating delivery
Improving code quality and reliability in complex codebases
Not Ideal For
Individuals or small teams not focused on code quality or compliance
Users seeking a general-purpose AI code generation tool
Teams that prefer entirely manual code review processes
Cursor
Best For
Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance
Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles
Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools
Developers working with complex or large codebases
Not Ideal For
Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment
Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations
Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Qodo is best for
✍️Writing & Content10.0💬Chat & Conversation10.0🤖Automation & Agents9.0
Cursor is best for
💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
QodoPros
- Outperforms other AI code review tools in precision and recall benchmarks
- Provides deep, multi-repository context for comprehensive analysis
- Offers flexible deployment options including on-premise and air-gapped for enterprises
- Integrates seamlessly with major Git platforms and IDEs
- SOC 2 Type II certified for robust security and compliance
- Significantly reduces developer hours spent on manual code review
Cons
- Free tier has limited monthly PRs and credits per user
- Free tier user data is utilized for model enhancement (opt-out available)
- Community support is only available for the free tier
- Advanced features like SSO and custom deployment are exclusive to enterprise plans
- No explicit mention of support for external AI agent frameworks
CursorPros
- Significantly boosts developer productivity
- Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
- Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
- Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
- Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
- Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile
Cons
- Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
- Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
- Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
- Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
- No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Qodo
7.7
/ 10
Cursor
8.0
/ 10
Your pick
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Qodo
7.0
Cursor
8.0▲ +1.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Qodo
9.0
Cursor
9.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Qodo
7.0
Cursor
8.0▲ +1.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Qodo
9.0▲ +1.0
Cursor
8.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Qodo
6.0
Cursor
7.0▲ +1.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Qodo
8.0
Cursor
8.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Qodo or Cursor?
Both are strong options. Qodo has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Qodo cheaper than Cursor?
Qodo starts at free (freemium model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Qodo and Cursor?
Qodo — "Automated, context-aware AI code review for complex codebases.". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.