Snyk vs Abnormal Security
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated May 2026
Trust & Reliability
Snyk
Uptime:Snyk does not publicly provide a fixed uptime SLA percentage. Their Service Level Agreement (SLA) details are documented in the Managed Services Agreement (MSA) for Enterprise Licenses, with tighter SLAs for Platinum Support customers. Their SaaS Agreement implies a target availability of 99.9% for service credits.Status page
Users:1M-10M
Customers (per vendor):Twilio, Yalo, Snowflake +7
GDPR
Overall Winner: Snyk
8.0/10 vs Abnormal Security at 7.3/10
Leads in:
Integrations
Customizability
Support
AI Comparison Summary
Snyk
8.0
avg score
Abnormal Security
7.3
avg score
Snyk leads overall — particularly in Customizability and Integration Power.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Snyk
8.0 / 10
Snyk
Best For
Organizations adopting AI-driven development
Developers using AI code assistants
Security teams managing application security at scale
CISOs focused on reducing security debt and governing AI development
Not Ideal For
Organizations not using AI in their development process
Individuals or small teams with very limited budgets who only need basic vulnerability scanning
Users looking for a standalone AI code generation tool
Abnormal Security
Best For
Protecting enterprise email from advanced phishing and social engineering
Automating security operations center (SOC) workflows
Preventing account takeovers in cloud email and SaaS applications
Enhancing security posture management for Microsoft 365
Not Ideal For
Individual users or very small businesses without complex email security needs
Organizations primarily seeking on-premise security solutions
General network or endpoint security beyond email and SaaS applications
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Snyk is best for
📊Data & Analytics7.0
Abnormal Security is best for
📊Data & Analytics7.5
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
SnykPros
- Secures AI-generated code at inception
- Accelerates remediation of vulnerabilities
- Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows
- Provides tool-agnostic control for various AI assistants
- Offers comprehensive security across code, dependencies, containers, and IaC
- Reduces risk and improves developer productivity
- Low false positive rate for API vulnerabilities
Cons
- Requires integration with existing developer tools and AI assistants
- Pricing for larger teams can be significant (per contributing developer)
- May require upfront effort for enterprise-scale deployment and policy definition
- Specific details on AI models used by Snyk AI itself are not provided
- No explicit mention of support for human-in-the-loop for all automated fixes
Abnormal SecurityPros
- Unmatched protection against advanced email threats using behavioral AI
- Autonomous detection and neutralization of threats in milliseconds
- Easy, three-click API integration with zero operational overhead
- Reduces phishing attacks by 90% and SOC headcount for email by 50%
- Replaces traditional secure email gateways (SEGs) for better efficacy and cost savings
- Provides hyperpersonalized security training to reduce phishing susceptibility
Cons
- Primarily focused on email and SaaS application security, not broader network security
- Requires integration with existing cloud platforms (e.g., Microsoft 365, Google Workspace)
- Pricing information is not publicly available, requiring direct contact for quotes
- May have a learning curve for security teams accustomed to traditional rule-based systems
- No explicit mention of on-premise deployment options
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Snyk
8.0
/ 10
Your pick
Abnormal Security
7.3
/ 10
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Snyk
7.0
Abnormal Security
7.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Snyk
8.0
Abnormal Security
9.0▲ +1.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Snyk
7.0
Abnormal Security
7.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Snyk
8.0▲ +2.0
Abnormal Security
6.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Snyk
8.0▲ +1.0
Abnormal Security
7.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Snyk
10.0▲ +2.0
Abnormal Security
8.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Task Performance
Snyk
Task
Abnormal Security
8.09.0
Threat Detection
9.06.0
Vulnerability Scanning
6.08.0
Incident Response
7.05.0
Compliance Auditing
5.08.0
Access Management
6.07.0
Log Analysis
3.010.0
Phishing Prevention
2.03.0
Encryption Management
8.08.0
Security Reporting
8.07.0
Risk Scoring
* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Snyk or Abnormal Security?
Both are strong options. Snyk has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Abnormal Security has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Snyk cheaper than Abnormal Security?
Snyk starts at free (freemium model) with a free trial. Abnormal Security starts at free (enterprise model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Snyk and Abnormal Security?
Snyk — "Unleash AI Innovators Securely". Abnormal Security — "Protect humans with behavioral AI against advanced cyber threats.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.