Tabby vs Cursor
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated May 2026
Trust & Reliability
Tabby
Users:10K-100K
Cursor
Customers (per vendor):Stripe, OpenAI, Datadog +7
GDPR
SOC 2
Overall Winner: Cursor
8.0/10 vs Tabby at 7.5/10
Leads in:
Output Quality
Ease of Use
AI Comparison Summary
Tabby
7.5
avg score
Cursor
8.0
avg score
Cursor leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Output Quality.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Cursor
8.0 / 10
Tabby
Best For
Developers seeking privacy and control over their AI coding assistant
Teams requiring self-hosted AI solutions for security compliance
Engineers looking for highly configurable coding AI
Developers working with diverse programming languages and IDEs
Not Ideal For
Non-technical users who prefer fully managed, zero-setup AI tools
Teams without the resources or expertise for self-hosting and maintenance
Users who require out-of-the-box integrations with a vast ecosystem of third-party tools beyond IDEs and Git
Cursor
Best For
Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance
Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles
Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools
Developers working with complex or large codebases
Not Ideal For
Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment
Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations
Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Tabby is best for
🤖Automation & Agents9.0🎧Customer Support9.0✍️Writing & Content7.0
Cursor is best for
💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
TabbyPros
- Open-source and transparent, enhancing trust and security
- Flexible deployment options (cloud and on-premises/self-hosted)
- Highly configurable to fit existing workflows and infrastructure
- Supports a wide range of IDEs and programming languages
- Offers advanced AI capabilities like code completion, inline chat, and answer engine
- No reliance on external DBMS or cloud services for core functionality
Cons
- Requires technical expertise for self-hosting and configuration
- Performance can be dependent on local hardware (GPUs)
- Some advanced models may have non-production licenses or require commercial licenses
- No explicit mention of advanced team collaboration features beyond user/group management
- Lack of specific data export formats mentioned for easy migration
CursorPros
- Significantly boosts developer productivity
- Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
- Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
- Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
- Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
- Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile
Cons
- Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
- Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
- Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
- Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
- No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Tabby
7.5
/ 10
Cursor
8.0
/ 10
Your pick
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Tabby
6.0
Cursor
8.0▲ +2.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Tabby
7.0
Cursor
9.0▲ +2.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Tabby
9.0▲ +1.0
Cursor
8.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Tabby
8.0
Cursor
8.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Tabby
7.0
Cursor
7.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Tabby
8.0
Cursor
8.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Tabby or Cursor?
Both are strong options. Tabby has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Tabby cheaper than Cursor?
Tabby starts at free (open_source model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Tabby and Cursor?
Tabby — "Secure, flexible, and transparent AI coding assistant for every developer.". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.