Torq vs Snyk
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated May 2026
Trust & Reliability
Torq
Customers (per vendor):Abnormal, Blackstone, Carvana +7
GDPR
Snyk
Uptime:Snyk does not publicly provide a fixed uptime SLA percentage. Their Service Level Agreement (SLA) details are documented in the Managed Services Agreement (MSA) for Enterprise Licenses, with tighter SLAs for Platinum Support customers. Their SaaS Agreement implies a target availability of 99.9% for service credits.Status page
Overall Winner: Snyk
8.0/10 vs Torq at 7.2/10
Leads in:
Integrations
Customizability
Support
AI Comparison Summary
Torq
7.2
avg score
Snyk
8.0
avg score
Snyk leads overall — particularly in Integration Power.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Snyk
8.0 / 10
Torq
Best For
Security Operations Centers (SOCs)
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) providers
Cloud & Application Security teams
IT Operations teams seeking automation
Not Ideal For
Individuals or very small businesses with minimal security needs
Organizations seeking a free or low-cost security solution
Teams without existing security tools to integrate
Snyk
Best For
Organizations adopting AI-driven development
Developers using AI code assistants
Security teams managing application security at scale
CISOs focused on reducing security debt and governing AI development
Not Ideal For
Organizations not using AI in their development process
Individuals or small teams with very limited budgets who only need basic vulnerability scanning
Users looking for a standalone AI code generation tool
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Torq is best for
📊Data & Analytics8.0
Snyk is best for
📊Data & Analytics7.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
TorqPros
- Significantly reduces mean time to detect (MTTD) and respond (MTTR)
- Automates up to 90% of Tier-1 security tasks
- Prevents analyst burnout and alert fatigue
- Scales security operations efficiently across multi-tenant environments
- Offers extensive integration capabilities with existing security stacks
- Provides transparent and auditable AI agent behavior
- Supports no-code, low-code, and full-code automation development
Cons
- Requires significant integration with existing security tools
- May have a learning curve for complex workflow customization
- Pricing model is enterprise-focused, potentially less accessible for smaller teams
- Relies on the quality and availability of integrated AI models (BYOS)
- Full benefits require a shift from traditional SOAR mindsets
SnykPros
- Secures AI-generated code at inception
- Accelerates remediation of vulnerabilities
- Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows
- Provides tool-agnostic control for various AI assistants
- Offers comprehensive security across code, dependencies, containers, and IaC
- Reduces risk and improves developer productivity
- Low false positive rate for API vulnerabilities
Cons
- Requires integration with existing developer tools and AI assistants
- Pricing for larger teams can be significant (per contributing developer)
- May require upfront effort for enterprise-scale deployment and policy definition
- Specific details on AI models used by Snyk AI itself are not provided
- No explicit mention of support for human-in-the-loop for all automated fixes
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Torq
7.2
/ 10
Snyk
8.0
/ 10
Your pick
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Torq
6.0
Snyk
7.0▲ +1.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Torq
8.0
Snyk
8.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Torq
7.0
Snyk
7.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Torq
7.0
Snyk
8.0▲ +1.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Torq
7.0
Snyk
8.0▲ +1.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Torq
8.0
Snyk
10.0▲ +2.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Task Performance
Torq
Task
Snyk
8.08.0
Threat Detection
7.09.0
Vulnerability Scanning
9.06.0
Incident Response
6.07.0
Compliance Auditing
7.05.0
Access Management
8.06.0
Log Analysis
8.03.0
Phishing Prevention
5.02.0
Encryption Management
8.08.0
Security Reporting
7.08.0
Risk Scoring
* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Torq or Snyk?
Both are strong options. Torq has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Snyk has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Torq cheaper than Snyk?
Torq starts at free (enterprise model). Snyk starts at free (freemium model) with a free trial. Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Torq and Snyk?
Torq — "Harness AI in the SOC to triage, investigate, and respond to threats faster.". Snyk — "Unleash AI Innovators Securely". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.