Wordly vs Lilt
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated May 2026
Trust & Reliability
Wordly
Users:1M-10M
Customers (per vendor):EY, Lilly, Hyatt +7
GDPR
SOC 2
Too Close to Call
Wordly (7.3) vs Lilt (7.2) — difference of 0.2 points
AI Comparison Summary
Wordly
7.3
avg score
Lilt
7.2
avg score
Wordly leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Wordly
7.3 / 10
Wordly
Best For
Making conferences and events multilingual and inclusive
Providing real-time language access for corporate meetings
Enhancing engagement in educational and training sessions
Facilitating communication in government and association meetings
Not Ideal For
Individuals needing casual, ad-hoc personal translation for one-on-one conversations
Organizations requiring certified human translation for legal or highly sensitive documents
Users seeking a free translation service
Lilt
Best For
Orchestrating enterprise localization programs
Developing multilingual AI models and evaluating performance
Launching products and campaigns in global markets
Translating technical documentation with accuracy
Not Ideal For
Individual users or small businesses needing simple, ad-hoc translations.
Users seeking a free or low-cost translation solution.
Teams without existing content management systems or complex localization needs.
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Wordly is best for
🔍Research8.0✍️Writing & Content4.0
Lilt is best for
✍️Writing & Content7.0🔍Research7.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
WordlyPros
- Significantly more affordable than human interpreters, saving 50-90% on costs
- Extremely easy and fast setup, requiring minutes instead of hours
- Provides four products (translation, captions, transcripts, summaries) for one price
- Supports a wide range of event formats including in-person, virtual, and hybrid
- High accuracy with customizable glossaries and continuous AI optimization
- Enterprise-grade security and compliance (SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001)
Cons
- Pricing is usage-based on hours and attendees, which may be less predictable for some budgets
- Requires purchasing packages of hours annually, not a simple monthly subscription
- No explicit mention of offline mode for attendees
- Relies on AI, which, while highly accurate, may not match the nuance of human interpretation in all contexts
- Optional features like SSO Access and Video Captions/Subtitles are not included in all base packages
LiltPros
- Scales multilingual content production for global markets rapidly
- Accelerates AI transformation with smarter, domain-specific models
- Ensures brand, legal, and regulatory compliance with secure communication
- Leverages a network of specialized domain experts for accuracy and consistency
- Offers custom and BYO AI models, including Gemini, GPT-4, and GPT-5
- Provides 100+ native integrations and robust APIs for existing tech stacks
Cons
- Pricing is enterprise-only, requiring custom quotes and contact with sales.
- No transparent pricing or free tier available for individual users or small businesses.
- Requires integration with existing content management systems for full benefit.
- Primarily targets large organizations, potentially over-engineered for smaller teams.
- No explicit mention of offline mode for translation work.
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Wordly
7.3
/ 10
Your pick
Lilt
7.2
/ 10
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Wordly
9.0▲ +3.0
Lilt
6.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Wordly
8.0
Lilt
9.0▲ +1.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Wordly
8.0▲ +1.0
Lilt
7.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Wordly
6.0
Lilt
6.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Wordly
6.0
Lilt
7.0▲ +1.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Wordly
7.0
Lilt
8.0▲ +1.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Task Performance
Wordly
Task
Lilt
8.07.0
Text Summarization
9.010.0
Language Translation
2.08.0
Grammar Correction
2.07.0
Paraphrasing
2.07.0
Readability Improvement
2.06.0
Format Conversion
2.07.0
Keyword Extraction
2.05.0
Sentiment Detection
2.06.0
Text Comparison
2.08.0
Batch Processing
* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Wordly or Lilt?
Both are strong options. Wordly has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Lilt has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Wordly cheaper than Lilt?
Wordly starts at free (paid model). Lilt starts at free (enterprise model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Wordly and Lilt?
Wordly — "Easy, accurate, and affordable AI translation and captioning for every event.". Lilt — "Make anything multilingual with AI-powered enterprise localization.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.