Agenta vs Rasa

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Data last refreshed August 2026
Agenta logo

Agenta

Agentatech UG

The open-source workspace for your agents

Open Source
81% verification coverage
VS
Rasa logo

Rasa

Rasa Technologies

Build Trustworthy AI Agents for Real-World Use

Freemium
75% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Agenta

GDPR
SOC 2

Rasa

Customers (per vendor):Swisscom, Groupe IMA, SmartRecruiters +7
GDPR

Overall Winner: Agenta

7.7/10 vs Rasa at 6.3/10

Leads in:
Customization
Integration
Compliance & Data Protection

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Agenta

7.7

avg score

Rasa

6.3

avg score

Agenta leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Integration and 1 more.

Rasa has an edge in Support.

Based on 6 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Agenta

7.7 / 10

Agenta

Best For
Engineering teams building code review or operations agents with full control over their stack
Product teams automating research and reporting workflows with human oversight
Teams running AI agents on their own infrastructure
Organizations requiring robust governance and compliance for AI automation

Rasa

Best For
Product teams building customer-facing AI
Developers and teams starting an AI agent project
Enterprises deploying conversational AI at scale
Conversational AI teams needing advanced support

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Agenta is best for

🤖Automation & Agents4.7📊Data & Analytics4.0

Rasa is best for

✍️Writing & Content8.0🤖Automation & Agents7.5💻Coding & Dev7.5

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

AgentaAgenta

Cons

  • Cloud Hobby plan limits team members to two and trace data retention to one week
RasaRasa

Cons

  • Free Developer Edition is limited to one bot per company with up to 1000 external or 100 internal conversations/month
  • IVR Connector to AudioCodes VoiceAI Connect is an additional purchase
  • Rasa does not host or control customer data, requiring customers to manage their own infrastructure
  • Rasa is not responsible for representations, warranties, promises, or commitments made by resellers
  • The software is licensed, not sold, and all rights not expressly granted are reserved by Rasa
  • Customer is responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable laws and third-party IP rights when using the products
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

Agenta

7.7

/ 10

Clear winner

Rasa

6.3

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Agenta
4.0▲ +3.0
Rasa
1.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Agenta
10.0▲ +1.0
Rasa
9.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Agenta
8.0
Rasa
10.0▲ +2.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Agenta
9.0▲ +3.0
Rasa
6.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Agenta
7.0▲ +3.0
Rasa
4.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Agenta
8.0
Rasa
8.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Agenta
—
Rasa
—

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Agenta

Task

Rasa

6.0
Role Definition
8.0
4.0
Task Decomposition
7.0
3.0
Agent Coordination
7.0
2.0
Inter Agent Communication
7.0
8.0
Workflow Orchestration
9.0
8.0
Tool Use Delegation
8.0
6.0
State Management
8.0
4.0
Error Recovery
8.0
9.0
Observability
9.0
3.0
Scalability Throughput
8.0
8.0
Workflow Building
8.0
8.0
Trigger Variety
4.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between Agenta and Rasa?
Agenta — "The open-source workspace for your agents". Rasa — "Build Trustworthy AI Agents for Real-World Use". The Features section on this page compares them side by side.
Who is Agenta best for compared with Rasa?
Agenta is best for Engineering teams building code review or operations agents with full control over their stack; and for Product teams automating research and reporting workflows with human oversight. Rasa is best for Product teams building customer-facing AI; and for Developers and teams starting an AI agent project.
How does the pricing of Agenta compare with Rasa?
Agenta is open source, includes a free plan, paid plans start at $29/month. Rasa is freemium, includes a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Does Agenta or Rasa have a free plan?
Agenta is open source. Rasa has a free plan. Always verify current pricing with the vendor.
Do Agenta and Rasa offer an API?
Agenta offers a public API. Rasa offers a public API.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.