Agno vs Cursor
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated June 2026
Trust & Reliability
Agno
Users:10K-100K
Cursor
Customers (per vendor):Stripe, OpenAI, Datadog +7
GDPR
SOC 2
Overall Winner: Cursor
8.0/10 vs Agno at 7.5/10
Leads in:
Output Quality
Ease of Use
Value for Money
AI Comparison Summary
Agno
7.5
avg score
Cursor
8.0
avg score
Cursor leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Cursor
8.0 / 10
Agno
Best For
Building and deploying multi-agent systems for developers
Orchestrating complex AI workflows in production environments
Ensuring data privacy and security for agentic applications
Teams needing high-performance and low-latency agent execution
Not Ideal For
Non-technical users seeking a no-code agent builder
Teams unwilling to manage their own cloud infrastructure
Simple, single-step automation tasks that don't require agentic capabilities
Cursor
Best For
Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance
Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles
Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools
Developers working with complex or large codebases
Not Ideal For
Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment
Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations
Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Agno is best for
🤖Automation & Agents8.3
Cursor is best for
💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
AgnoPros
- Runs entirely in your cloud, ensuring data privacy and control with no egress costs
- Significantly faster agent instantiation and lower memory footprint than competitors
- Flexible and agnostic, supporting any LLM, database, and cloud provider
- Comprehensive control plane for real-time monitoring, tracing, and management
- Robust human-in-the-loop capabilities for controlled agent execution
- Open-source framework with a strong community and extensive documentation
Cons
- Requires Python knowledge and coding skills, not suitable for no-code users
- Self-hosted deployment requires user's own cloud infrastructure management
- Newer framework compared to established alternatives like LangChain, potentially smaller ecosystem
- Advanced features like custom SSO and dedicated support are locked behind enterprise tiers
CursorPros
- Significantly boosts developer productivity
- Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
- Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
- Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
- Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
- Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile
Cons
- Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
- Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
- Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
- Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
- No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Agno
7.5
/ 10
Cursor
8.0
/ 10
Your pick
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Agno
6.0
Cursor
8.0▲ +2.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Agno
8.0
Cursor
9.0▲ +1.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Agno
7.0
Cursor
8.0▲ +1.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Agno
9.0▲ +1.0
Cursor
8.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Agno
7.0
Cursor
7.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Agno
8.0
Cursor
8.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Agno or Cursor?
Both are strong options. Agno has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Agno cheaper than Cursor?
Agno starts at free (freemium model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Agno and Cursor?
Agno — "A new architecture for multi-agent systems that runs in your cloud.". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.