Launching soon — get early access:

Amp vs Augment Code

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated October 2026
Amp logo

Amp

Amp Frontier Corporation

The frontier coding agent — web, terminal & phone

Freemium
83% verification coverage
VS
Augment Code logo

Augment Code

Augment Computing

The agentic SDLC platform for loops

Paid
81% verification coverage

Trust & Reliability

Amp

Uptime:99.40% (90-day)Status page
Users:1M-10M
Customers (per vendor):Intel, Westpac, Indeed +7
SOC 2

Augment Code

Uptime:99.93%Status page
Users:100K-1M
Customers (per vendor):Adobe, MongoDB, Pure Storage +7
GDPR
SOC 2
HIPAA

Overall Winner: Augment Code

7.0/10 vs Amp at 5.7/10

Leads in:
Customization
Integration
Compliance & Data Protection

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

AI Comparison Summary

Amp

5.7

avg score

Augment Code

7.0

avg score

Augment Code leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Compliance & Data Protection.

Based on 7 dimensions

Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →

Overall Winner

Augment Code

7.0 / 10

Amp

Best For
Developers running several long-lived agents in parallel without local worktrees or port conflicts
Teams that want agents to wake on outside events like a new Linear issue or CI failing on main
Developers who want to review agent changes and preview the running app from any device
Teams collaborating on the same agent session together via multiplayer orbs

Augment Code

Best For
Enterprise engineering teams automating repetitive SDLC tasks at scale
Development teams seeking to accelerate code review and merge times
Security teams automating vulnerability remediation and incident response
Organizations modernizing large, complex codebases with AI-driven migrations

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Amp is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research9.0

Augment Code is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research7.0

Filter by your use case:

Limitations

AmpAmp

Cons

No cons listed yet.

Augment CodeAugment Code

Cons

  • Standard and Business plans each cover up to 50 seats
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5
Customization5
Support5
Integration5
Compliance & Data Protection5
Performance5
Planning Quality5

Dimension Comparison

Ease of UseCustomizationSupportIntegrationCompliancePerformancePlanning

Amp

5.7

/ 10

Augment Code

7.0

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

AI

How intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?

Amp
3.0
Augment Code
5.0▲ +2.0

Customization

Calculated

How much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?

Amp
7.0
Augment Code
8.0▲ +1.0

Support

AI

How strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?

Amp
5.0
Augment Code
6.0▲ +1.0

Integration

Calculated

How well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?

Amp
7.0
Augment Code
8.0▲ +1.0

Compliance & Data Protection

Calculated

Compliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path

Amp
4.0
Augment Code
8.0▲ +4.0

Performance

Calculated

Latency + throughput speed

Amp
5.0
Augment Code
6.0▲ +1.0

Planning Quality

Calculated

Multi-step planning depth + replanning capability

Amp
9.0▲ +1.0
Augment Code
8.0

Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Amp

Task

Augment Code

1.0
Code Completion
7.0
9.0
Bug Detection
7.0
9.0
Code Explanation
7.0
9.0
Refactoring
7.0
8.0
Test Generation
7.0
8.0
Multi Language Support
6.0
9.0
Context Understanding
9.0
7.0
Documentation Generation
5.0
6.0
Performance Optimization
4.0
5.0
Security Scanning
7.0
8.0
Workflow Building
8.0
8.0
Trigger Variety
7.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Amp or Augment Code?
Both are strong options. Amp is a strong choice, while Augment Code is a strong choice. The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Amp cheaper than Augment Code?
Amp starts at free (freemium model). Augment Code starts at $20/month (paid model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Amp and Augment Code?
Amp — "The frontier coding agent — web, terminal & phone". Augment Code — "The agentic SDLC platform for loops". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.
Can I use Amp and Augment Code together?
Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Amp and Augment Code with other tools and save your AI toolkit.
Does Amp or Augment Code have a free plan?
Amp is available for free. Augment Code is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.