Does Amp (Sourcegraph) or Mentat have a free plan?

Amp (Sourcegraph) is available for free. Mentat is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Amp (Sourcegraph) vs Mentat

Q: Can I use Amp (Sourcegraph) and Mentat together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Amp (Sourcegraph) and Mentat with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Sourcegraph, Inc.

Code understanding for humans and agents

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Mentat

AbanteAI

The cloud-native coding agent for GitHub

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

88% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):Indeed, Dropbox, Leidos +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0/10 vs Mentat at 6.3/10

Leads in:

Integrations

Customizability

AI Comparison Summary

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

avg score

Mentat

6.3

avg score

Amp (Sourcegraph) leads overall — particularly in Customizability and Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0 / 10

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Best For

Providing clear answers in complex codebases for engineering teams

Enhancing AI agent accuracy in legacy codebases

Automating large-scale code migrations and refactors

Identifying and fixing code vulnerabilities at scale

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users needing a no-code solution

Small, simple codebases where deep code intelligence is not critical

Users who prefer no advertising in free tiers

Mentat

Best For

Software developers

Engineering teams

Open-source project maintainers

Teams using GitHub for version control

Not Ideal For

Non-coding related tasks or general content generation

Teams not using GitHub for version control

Highly sensitive projects requiring strict on-premise deployment

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Amp (Sourcegraph) is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🤖Automation & Agents9.0

Mentat is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research8.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Pros

Lightning-fast search at enterprise scale across millions of repositories
Universal compatibility with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gerrit, Perforce and more
SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance for robust security
Zero data retention and no model training with user data for privacy
Enterprise-ready SSO with SAML, OpenID Connect, and OAuth for secure authentication
Fine-grained Role-based Access Controls (RBAC) for secure team access
Frictionless OAuth setup for connecting AI agents via MCP server

Cons

Amp Free Mode is advertiser-sponsored, with keyword searches for ad placement
Requires technical expertise for full utilization, not suitable for non-developers
No explicit visual builder for non-technical users to create workflows
Less suitable for small, simple codebases where deep code intelligence is not critical

Mentat

Pros

Seamless GitHub integration
Automates common development bottlenecks
Scalable for managing multiple projects/agents
Provides a powerful web-based coding environment
Accessible from mobile devices for on-the-go management
Reduces manual effort in code review and debugging

Cons

Primarily focused on coding tasks, not general AI assistance
Requires integration with GitHub, limiting use for other VCS
Reliance on external AI models (Anthropic, OpenAI) for core intelligence
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment options
Limited information on advanced customization beyond scripts

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

/ 10

Your pick

Mentat

6.3

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Amp (Sourcegraph)

6.0

Mentat

7.0▲ +1.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

Mentat

8.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

Mentat

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0▲ +2.0

Mentat

5.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

Mentat

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Amp (Sourcegraph)

8.0▲ +4.0

Mentat

4.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Task

Mentat

7.0

Code Completion

7.0

6.0

Bug Detection

8.0

Code Explanation

7.0

Refactoring

8.0

5.0

Test Generation

7.0

9.0

Multi Language Support

6.0

9.0

Context Understanding

9.0

7.0

Documentation Generation

6.0

Performance Optimization

7.0

8.0

Security Scanning

5.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Amp (Sourcegraph) or Mentat?

Both are strong options. Amp (Sourcegraph) has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Mentat has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Amp (Sourcegraph) cheaper than Mentat?

Amp (Sourcegraph) starts at $49/month (freemium model). Mentat starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Amp (Sourcegraph) and Mentat?

Amp (Sourcegraph) — "Code understanding for humans and agents". Mentat — "The cloud-native coding agent for GitHub". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Amp (Sourcegraph) and Mentat together?

Explore Alternatives

Amp (Sourcegraph) Alternatives

Tools similar to Amp (Sourcegraph)

Mentat Alternatives

Tools similar to Mentat

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.