Does Browser Use or GitHub Copilot have a free plan?

Browser Use is available for free. GitHub Copilot is available for free with a free trial. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Browser Use vs GitHub Copilot

Q: Can I use Browser Use and GitHub Copilot together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Browser Use and GitHub Copilot with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

Browser Use

Browser Use Inc.

Automate web tasks at scale with undetectable AI agents and custom LLMs.

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

GitHub Copilot

GitHub

Write better code with AI

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

91% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Browser Use

Users:10K-100K

Customers (per vendor):Airbnb, Amazon, Anthropic +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Too Close to Call

GitHub Copilot (7.5) vs Browser Use (7.2) — difference of 0.3 points

AI Comparison Summary

Browser Use

7.2

avg score

GitHub Copilot

7.5

avg score

GitHub Copilot leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Support & Ecosystem.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

GitHub Copilot

7.5 / 10

Browser Use

Best For

Automating complex multi-step web workflows for developers

Performing large-scale data extraction and web scraping

Conducting QA testing and monitoring of web applications

Bypassing anti-bot and geo-restriction measures

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking no-code automation solutions

Simple, single-step browser interactions that don't require advanced stealth

Users unwilling to write or integrate code for automation

GitHub Copilot

Best For

Developers seeking to accelerate coding

Learning new programming languages or frameworks

Automating repetitive coding tasks

Improving code quality and reducing bugs

Not Ideal For

Developers who prefer to write all code manually

Projects with extremely strict, custom coding standards not understood by AI

Situations requiring offline coding assistance

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Browser Use is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.7

GitHub Copilot is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.0🔍Research8.0🎧Customer Support8.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Browser Use

Pros

Offers both an open-source library and a managed cloud platform
Provides highly undetectable stealth browsers with proxy support
Includes custom-trained LLMs optimized for browser automation tasks
Supports complex multi-step workflows and code generation for precision
Features a marketplace of reusable 'Skills' to quickly build automations
SOC 2 Type II compliant for enterprise-grade security

Cons

Requires coding knowledge (Python/TypeScript) for full utilization
Cloud platform pricing can become usage-based and complex for high volumes
Custom LLMs are proprietary to Browser Use, potentially limiting flexibility
No visual builder or low-code interface for non-developers
Relatively new product with a rapidly evolving API (SDK 3.0 with breaking changes)

GitHub Copilot

Pros

Significantly speeds up coding
Reduces boilerplate code
Helps discover new APIs and patterns
Improves code quality and consistency
Integrates seamlessly into popular IDEs
Offers AI-powered chat for coding assistance

Cons

Can sometimes generate incorrect or inefficient code
Requires an active internet connection
May not always understand complex project contexts
Potential for code suggestions to be overly verbose or repetitive

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Browser Use

7.2

/ 10

GitHub Copilot

7.5

/ 10

Your pick

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Browser Use

6.0

GitHub Copilot

8.0▲ +2.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Browser Use

8.0▲ +1.0

GitHub Copilot

7.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Browser Use

7.0

GitHub Copilot

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Browser Use

9.0▲ +1.0

GitHub Copilot

8.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Browser Use

7.0

GitHub Copilot

9.0▲ +2.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Browser Use

6.0

GitHub Copilot

6.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Browser Use or GitHub Copilot?

Both are strong options. Browser Use has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while GitHub Copilot has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Browser Use cheaper than GitHub Copilot?

Browser Use starts at free (freemium model). GitHub Copilot starts at free (freemium model) with a free trial. Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Browser Use and GitHub Copilot?

Browser Use — "Automate web tasks at scale with undetectable AI agents and custom LLMs.". GitHub Copilot — "Write better code with AI". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Browser Use and GitHub Copilot together?

Explore Alternatives

Browser Use Alternatives

Tools similar to Browser Use

GitHub Copilot Alternatives

Tools similar to GitHub Copilot

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.