Can I use ChatDev and JARVIS (HuggingGPT) together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine ChatDev and JARVIS (HuggingGPT) with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Does ChatDev or JARVIS (HuggingGPT) have a free plan?

ChatDev is a paid tool. JARVIS (HuggingGPT) is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

ChatDev vs JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

ChatDev

OpenBMB

Build software autonomously with a virtual company of AI agents

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

85% data quality

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

Microsoft Research

Orchestrate expert AI models with an LLM as the central controller

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

84% data quality

Trust & Reliability

ChatDev

Trust data not available yet

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

Trust data not available yet

Overall Winner: JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

5.5/10 vs ChatDev at 4.8/10

Leads in:

Value for Money

Output Quality

Customizability

AI Comparison Summary

ChatDev

4.8

avg score

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

5.5

avg score

JARVIS (HuggingGPT) leads overall — particularly in Customizability.

ChatDev has an edge in Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

5.5 / 10

ChatDev

Best For

Automating software development workflows for developers

Researching collective intelligence in AI agents

Rapid prototyping of software ideas

Learning about multi-agent system design

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code software builder

Large-scale enterprise software development projects

Users unwilling to manage API keys and local Python environments

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

Best For

Orchestrating diverse AI models for multi-modal tasks

Researchers exploring LLM-driven agentic systems

Developing complex AI applications with tool use

Integrating various Hugging Face models into workflows

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution

Simple, single-step AI tasks

Users without access to powerful computing resources

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

ChatDev is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.3

JARVIS (HuggingGPT) is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

ChatDev

Pros

Open-source and highly customizable, allowing for extensive modification
Simulates a complete software development lifecycle with distinct agent roles
Generates functional and runnable software projects
Provides a clear framework for studying multi-agent collaboration
Easy to set up and run locally with Python and an OpenAI API key

Cons

Requires Python knowledge and command-line interface familiarity
Dependent on external LLM providers like OpenAI, incurring API costs
No graphical user interface for non-technical users
Generated software complexity is limited by LLM capabilities and prompt engineering
Lacks built-in version control or advanced project management features

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

Pros

Leverages a wide range of expert models from Hugging Face
Enables LLMs to perform complex multi-modal tasks
Open-source and extensible for research and development
Facilitates advanced planning and tool-use capabilities

Cons

Requires technical expertise to set up and configure
Performance depends on the underlying LLM and expert models
May have high computational resource requirements
Limited direct user interface, primarily code-driven

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

ChatDev

4.8

/ 10

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

5.5

/ 10

Your pick

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

ChatDev

3.0

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

3.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

ChatDev

6.0

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

7.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

ChatDev

8.0

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

9.0▲ +1.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

ChatDev

2.0

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

7.0▲ +5.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

ChatDev

6.0

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

6.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

ChatDev

4.0▲ +3.0

JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

1.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, ChatDev or JARVIS (HuggingGPT)?

Both are strong options. ChatDev has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while JARVIS (HuggingGPT) has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is ChatDev cheaper than JARVIS (HuggingGPT)?

ChatDev starts at free (open_source model). JARVIS (HuggingGPT) starts at free (open_source model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between ChatDev and JARVIS (HuggingGPT)?

ChatDev — "Build software autonomously with a virtual company of AI agents". JARVIS (HuggingGPT) — "Orchestrate expert AI models with an LLM as the central controller". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Explore Alternatives

ChatDev Alternatives

Tools similar to ChatDev

JARVIS (HuggingGPT) Alternatives

Tools similar to JARVIS (HuggingGPT)

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.