Does CodeGeeX or Trigger.dev have a free plan?

CodeGeeX is available for free. Trigger.dev is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

CodeGeeX vs Trigger.dev

Q: Can I use CodeGeeX and Trigger.dev together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine CodeGeeX and Trigger.dev with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

CodeGeeX

Zhipu AI

Generate multilingual code with an open-source AI model.

0.0(0)

FREE

82% data quality

Trigger.dev

API Hero Ltd

Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Trust & Reliability

CodeGeeX

Users:1M-10M

Trigger.dev

Uptime:99%Status page

Users:10K-100K

Overall Winner: Trigger.dev

8.2/10 vs CodeGeeX at 5.7/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Customizability

Support

AI Comparison Summary

CodeGeeX

5.7

avg score

Trigger.dev

8.2

avg score

Trigger.dev leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Output Quality and 3 more.

CodeGeeX has an edge in Value for Money.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Trigger.dev

8.2 / 10

CodeGeeX

Best For

Generating code snippets for developers

Automating repetitive coding tasks

Assisting with multilingual programming projects

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution

Teams requiring a fully managed cloud IDE with AI

Users looking for a drag-and-drop code builder

Trigger.dev

Best For

Building production-ready AI agents for developers

Orchestrating complex multi-step AI workflows

Automating long-running background jobs without timeouts

Integrating AI capabilities into existing TypeScript applications

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code workflow builder

Teams requiring deterministic replay across multiple programming languages (e.g., Go, Java, Python, Ruby, Swift)

Simple, single-step automation tasks that don't require durability or complex orchestration

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

CodeGeeX is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.0🎧Customer Support8.0✍️Writing & Content6.0

Trigger.dev is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.7

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

CodeGeeX

Pros

Open-source with Apache-2.0 license
Supports multilingual code generation
High star count on GitHub indicates community interest
Leverages pretrained models for efficiency

Cons

Requires technical expertise for setup and integration
Limited direct user interface (primarily a model)
No explicit mention of cloud-hosted service or GUI

Trigger.dev

Pros

Open-source and self-hostable with Apache 2.0 license
TypeScript-native development experience with minimal boilerplate
Managed infrastructure handles scaling, retries, and queues automatically
Comprehensive observability and monitoring with real-time tracing
Supports human-in-the-loop workflows and real-time frontend updates
Flexible build extensions for custom tooling and system packages

Cons

Primarily focused on TypeScript, less native support for other languages compared to alternatives
Requires coding knowledge; no visual builder for non-developers
Managed service incurs usage-based costs beyond free tier
Not designed for polyglot enterprise orchestration requiring deterministic replay across many languages

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

CodeGeeX

5.7

/ 10

Trigger.dev

8.2

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

CodeGeeX

3.0

Trigger.dev

7.0▲ +4.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

CodeGeeX

7.0

Trigger.dev

9.0▲ +2.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

CodeGeeX

10.0▲ +2.0

Trigger.dev

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

CodeGeeX

7.0

Trigger.dev

9.0▲ +2.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

CodeGeeX

6.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +2.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

CodeGeeX

1.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, CodeGeeX or Trigger.dev?

Both are strong options. CodeGeeX has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Trigger.dev has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is CodeGeeX cheaper than Trigger.dev?

CodeGeeX starts at free (free model). Trigger.dev starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between CodeGeeX and Trigger.dev?

CodeGeeX — "Generate multilingual code with an open-source AI model.". Trigger.dev — "Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use CodeGeeX and Trigger.dev together?

Explore Alternatives

CodeGeeX Alternatives

Tools similar to CodeGeeX

Trigger.dev Alternatives

Tools similar to Trigger.dev

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.