Does CodeRabbit or Amp (Sourcegraph) have a free plan?

CodeRabbit is available for free with a free trial. Amp (Sourcegraph) is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

CodeRabbit vs Amp (Sourcegraph)

Q: Can I use CodeRabbit and Amp (Sourcegraph) together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine CodeRabbit and Amp (Sourcegraph) with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

CodeRabbit

CodeRabbit Inc

Cut code review time & bugs in half Instantly.

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Sourcegraph, Inc.

Code understanding for humans and agents

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Trust & Reliability

CodeRabbit

Users:1K-10K

Customers (per vendor):NVIDIA, Abnormal, Ashby +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: CodeRabbit

7.8/10 vs Amp (Sourcegraph) at 7.0/10

Leads in:

Customizability

Output Quality

Support

AI Comparison Summary

CodeRabbit

7.8

avg score

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

avg score

CodeRabbit leads overall — particularly in Customizability.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

CodeRabbit

7.8 / 10

CodeRabbit

Best For

Automating code review processes for development teams

Improving code quality and reducing bugs in software projects

Accelerating pull request cycles for fast-moving teams

Generating comprehensive implementation plans from issues for coding agents

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users without coding knowledge

Teams not using Git-based version control systems

Projects that do not require rigorous code quality checks

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Best For

Providing clear answers in complex codebases for engineering teams

Enhancing AI agent accuracy in legacy codebases

Automating large-scale code migrations and refactors

Identifying and fixing code vulnerabilities at scale

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users needing a no-code solution

Small, simple codebases where deep code intelligence is not critical

Users who prefer no advertising in free tiers

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

CodeRabbit is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research8.0

Amp (Sourcegraph) is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🤖Automation & Agents9.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

CodeRabbit

Pros

Significantly reduces code review time and effort
Catches complex bugs and edge cases often missed by human reviewers
Provides actionable 1-click and AI-powered fixes
Offers deep context awareness for accurate and relevant feedback
Highly customizable to fit specific coding guidelines and workflows
Integrates seamlessly across major Git platforms, IDEs, and CLI
Continuously learns and improves from team feedback

Cons

Requires developer expertise for advanced configuration via YAML
Full functionality and higher limits are behind paid tiers
May require initial training and feedback to align with specific team preferences
Relies on third-party LLMs (OpenAI, Anthropic) for core AI capabilities
CLI access requires a usage-based add-on for unrestricted use

Amp (Sourcegraph)

Pros

Lightning-fast search at enterprise scale across millions of repositories
Universal compatibility with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gerrit, Perforce and more
SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance for robust security
Zero data retention and no model training with user data for privacy
Enterprise-ready SSO with SAML, OpenID Connect, and OAuth for secure authentication
Fine-grained Role-based Access Controls (RBAC) for secure team access
Frictionless OAuth setup for connecting AI agents via MCP server

Cons

Amp Free Mode is advertiser-sponsored, with keyword searches for ad placement
Requires technical expertise for full utilization, not suitable for non-developers
No explicit visual builder for non-technical users to create workflows
Less suitable for small, simple codebases where deep code intelligence is not critical

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

CodeRabbit

7.8

/ 10

Your pick

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

CodeRabbit

7.0▲ +1.0

Amp (Sourcegraph)

6.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

CodeRabbit

8.0▲ +1.0

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

CodeRabbit

7.0

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

CodeRabbit

9.0▲ +2.0

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

CodeRabbit

8.0▲ +1.0

Amp (Sourcegraph)

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

CodeRabbit

8.0

Amp (Sourcegraph)

8.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

CodeRabbit

Task

Amp (Sourcegraph)

2.0

Code Completion

7.0

9.0

Bug Detection

6.0

7.0

Code Explanation

8.0

Refactoring

7.0

8.0

Test Generation

5.0

7.0

Multi Language Support

9.0

Context Understanding

9.0

8.0

Documentation Generation

7.0

6.0

Performance Optimization

6.0

8.0

Security Scanning

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, CodeRabbit or Amp (Sourcegraph)?

Both are strong options. CodeRabbit has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Amp (Sourcegraph) has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is CodeRabbit cheaper than Amp (Sourcegraph)?

CodeRabbit starts at free (freemium model) with a free trial. Amp (Sourcegraph) starts at $49/month (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between CodeRabbit and Amp (Sourcegraph)?

CodeRabbit — "Cut code review time & bugs in half Instantly.". Amp (Sourcegraph) — "Code understanding for humans and agents". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use CodeRabbit and Amp (Sourcegraph) together?

Explore Alternatives

CodeRabbit Alternatives

Tools similar to CodeRabbit

Amp (Sourcegraph) Alternatives

Tools similar to Amp (Sourcegraph)

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.