Does Cybereason or Torq have a free plan?

Cybereason is a paid tool. Torq is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Cybereason vs Torq

Q: Which is better, Cybereason or Torq?

Both are strong options. Cybereason has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Torq has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Q: Is Cybereason cheaper than Torq?

Cybereason starts at free (enterprise model). Torq starts at free (enterprise model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

Q: What are the main differences between Cybereason and Torq?

Cybereason — "Reverse the adversary advantage with AI-powered cyber defense.". Torq — "Harness AI in the SOC to triage, investigate, and respond to threats faster.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Q: Can I use Cybereason and Torq together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Cybereason and Torq with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Cybereason

Reverse the adversary advantage with AI-powered cyber defense.

0.0(0)

ENTERPRISE

82% data quality

Torq

Torq Technologies Ltd.

Harness AI in the SOC to triage, investigate, and respond to threats faster.

0.0(0)

ENTERPRISE

88% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Cybereason

Users:<1K

Customers (per vendor):Seton Hall University, Motorola Mobility, Olist

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Torq

7.2/10 vs Cybereason at 5.5/10

Leads in:

Integrations

Customizability

AI Comparison Summary

Cybereason

5.5

avg score

Torq

7.2

avg score

Torq leads overall — particularly in Customizability and Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Torq

7.2 / 10

Cybereason

Best For

Detecting and responding to advanced cyber threats

Proactive threat hunting and mitigation

Managing endpoint security across an enterprise

Building comprehensive cyber resilience programs

Not Ideal For

Individual users or very small businesses with limited security budgets

Organizations seeking a free or low-cost security solution

Users without dedicated security teams or managed security services

Torq

Best For

Security Operations Centers (SOCs)

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) providers

Cloud & Application Security teams

IT Operations teams seeking automation

Not Ideal For

Individuals or very small businesses with minimal security needs

Organizations seeking a free or low-cost security solution

Teams without existing security tools to integrate

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Cybereason is best for

📊Data & Analytics8.0

Torq is best for

📊Data & Analytics8.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Cybereason

Pros

Operation-centric approach (MalOp™) significantly reduces alert fatigue and investigation time
Comprehensive protection across endpoint, identity, workspace, cloud, and network
AI-powered threat detection and predictive response capabilities
24/7 elite incident response services available worldwide
Strong compliance and security certifications including SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001
Flexible deployment options including cloud and on-premise for airgapped environments

Cons

No explicit pricing details available, suggesting a high cost for enterprise solutions
Requires a dedicated security team or managed service for full utilization of advanced features
No clear mention of a public API for custom integrations beyond general 'Technology Partners'
No free trial or freemium model is publicly advertised

Torq

Pros

Significantly reduces mean time to detect (MTTD) and respond (MTTR)
Automates up to 90% of Tier-1 security tasks
Prevents analyst burnout and alert fatigue
Scales security operations efficiently across multi-tenant environments
Offers extensive integration capabilities with existing security stacks
Provides transparent and auditable AI agent behavior
Supports no-code, low-code, and full-code automation development

Cons

Requires significant integration with existing security tools
May have a learning curve for complex workflow customization
Pricing model is enterprise-focused, potentially less accessible for smaller teams
Relies on the quality and availability of integrated AI models (BYOS)
Full benefits require a shift from traditional SOAR mindsets

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Cybereason

5.5

/ 10

Torq

7.2

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Cybereason

6.0

Torq

6.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Cybereason

9.0▲ +1.0

Torq

8.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Cybereason

7.0

Torq

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Cybereason

2.0

Torq

7.0▲ +5.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Cybereason

8.0▲ +1.0

Torq

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Cybereason

1.0

Torq

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Cybereason

Task

Torq

9.0

Threat Detection

8.0

Vulnerability Scanning

7.0

9.0

Incident Response

9.0

8.0

Compliance Auditing

6.0

7.0

Access Management

7.0

8.0

Log Analysis

8.0

7.0

Phishing Prevention

8.0

5.0

Encryption Management

5.0

8.0

Security Reporting

8.0

7.0

Risk Scoring

7.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Cybereason or Torq?

Both are strong options. Cybereason has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Torq has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Cybereason cheaper than Torq?

Cybereason starts at free (enterprise model). Torq starts at free (enterprise model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Cybereason and Torq?

Cybereason — "Reverse the adversary advantage with AI-powered cyber defense.". Torq — "Harness AI in the SOC to triage, investigate, and respond to threats faster.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Cybereason and Torq together?

Explore Alternatives

Cybereason Alternatives

Tools similar to Cybereason

Torq Alternatives

Tools similar to Torq

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.