Does Devika or Qwen Agent have a free plan?

Devika is a paid tool. Qwen Agent is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Devika vs Qwen Agent

Q: Can I use Devika and Qwen Agent together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Devika and Qwen Agent with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Devika

Stition AI

An open-source autonomous AI agent for coding and software development.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

74% data quality

Qwen Agent

Alibaba

An open-source agent framework for building intelligent, multi-modal AI applications

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

86% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Devika

Trust data not available yet

Qwen Agent

Trust data not available yet

Overall Winner: Qwen Agent

6.5/10 vs Devika at 5.5/10

Leads in:

Value for Money

Customizability

Integrations

AI Comparison Summary

Devika

5.5

avg score

Qwen Agent

6.5

avg score

Qwen Agent leads overall — particularly in Customizability and Integration Power.

Devika has an edge in Ease of Use.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Qwen Agent

6.5 / 10

Devika

Best For

Software developers

Open-source contributors

Teams building AI-powered applications

Automating coding tasks

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users

Project management without coding

Design or creative content generation

Qwen Agent

Best For

Developers building advanced AI agents

Integrating advanced LLM capabilities into applications

Automating complex, multi-step tasks with AI

Creating AI solutions with code execution and RAG

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code solution

Simple, one-shot AI tasks that don't require complex orchestration

Users who prefer a fully managed, cloud-hosted agent platform

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Devika is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.0🎧Customer Support8.0✍️Writing & Content7.0

Qwen Agent is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.0🎧Customer Support8.0✍️Writing & Content7.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Devika

Pros

Open-source for transparency and customization
Aids in code generation and debugging
Potentially accelerates development workflows
Community-driven development

Cons

Requires technical expertise to set up and use
Specific capabilities and performance are not detailed
May require significant configuration for complex projects
Limited official support compared to commercial tools

Qwen Agent

Pros

Open-source with Apache-2.0 license for flexibility
Supports advanced capabilities like function calling and code interpretation
Built upon powerful Qwen foundation models
Includes RAG for improved knowledge retrieval
Compatible with OpenAI API, vLLM, and Ollama for model choice
Multi-modal capabilities including image generation and editing

Cons

Requires strong Python and development knowledge
No visual builder or low-code interface for non-developers
Setup and configuration can be complex for beginners
Primarily focused on Qwen models, though other LLMs are supported
Limited explicit documentation outside of GitHub and blog posts

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Devika

5.5

/ 10

Qwen Agent

6.5

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Devika

6.0▲ +3.0

Qwen Agent

3.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Devika

7.0

Qwen Agent

7.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Devika

8.0

Qwen Agent

9.0▲ +1.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Devika

4.0

Qwen Agent

8.0▲ +4.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Devika

7.0▲ +1.0

Qwen Agent

6.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Devika

1.0

Qwen Agent

6.0▲ +5.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Devika

Task

Qwen Agent

8.0

Code Completion

7.0

Bug Detection

6.0

7.0

Code Explanation

7.0

Refactoring

6.0

Test Generation

5.0

8.0

Multi Language Support

8.0

7.0

Context Understanding

7.0

6.0

Documentation Generation

6.0

7.0

Performance Optimization

5.0

7.0

Security Scanning

5.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Devika or Qwen Agent?

Both are strong options. Devika has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Qwen Agent has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Devika cheaper than Qwen Agent?

Devika starts at free (open_source model). Qwen Agent starts at free (open_source model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Devika and Qwen Agent?

Devika — "An open-source autonomous AI agent for coding and software development.". Qwen Agent — "An open-source agent framework for building intelligent, multi-modal AI applications". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Devika and Qwen Agent together?

Explore Alternatives

Devika Alternatives

Tools similar to Devika

Qwen Agent Alternatives

Tools similar to Qwen Agent

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.