Does Dify or Flowise have a free plan?

Dify is a paid tool. Flowise is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Dify vs Flowise

Q: Can I use Dify and Flowise together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Dify and Flowise with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Dify

LangGenius, Inc.

Build production-ready AI agents and applications with agentic workflows.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

90% data quality

Flowise

FlowiseAI Inc.

Visually build and deploy AI agents and LLM workflows with ease.

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

93% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Dify

Users:1M-10M

Customers (per vendor):Volvo Cars, Ricoh, Kakaku.com

GDPR

Flowise

Too Close to Call

Dify (7.5) vs Flowise (7.5) — difference of 0.0 points

AI Comparison Summary

Dify

7.5

avg score

Flowise

7.5

avg score

Both tools score very similarly overall — the best choice depends on your specific priorities.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Too close to call — it's a tie

Dify

Best For

Building and deploying production-ready AI agents

Developing AI applications with RAG pipelines

Creating complex LLM workflows with a no-code interface

Accelerating AI idea validation and MVP development

Not Ideal For

Users seeking a simple, single-purpose AI chatbot without custom development needs

Non-technical users who prefer fully managed, off-the-shelf AI solutions

Individuals or small teams with no budget for paid tiers and high usage

Flowise

Best For

Visually building AI agents and LLM workflows for developers

Creating conversational AI assistants with knowledge retrieval

Orchestrating multi-agent systems for complex tasks

Rapid prototyping and deployment of AI applications

Not Ideal For

Users seeking a fully managed, no-configuration AI agent solution

Projects requiring extremely low-level code control without any visual abstraction

Organizations with strict open-source license requirements (due to 'NOASSERTION' license)

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Dify is best for

No task data yet

Flowise is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Dify

Pros

Open-source platform with a vibrant community
Supports a wide range of major LLM providers and local models
Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder simplifies complex AI logic
Comprehensive debugging tools including single-step and variable inspection
Offers both cloud service and self-hosted deployment options
Includes enterprise-grade security features like SSO and access control

Cons

Free tier has limited message credits and features
Requires technical understanding for advanced customization and self-hosting
No explicit mention of offline mode for cloud service
Future copyright date (2026) suggests potential for unreleased features or a placeholder

Flowise

Pros

Intuitive drag-and-drop UI simplifies complex AI workflow creation
Supports a wide range of LLMs, embeddings, and vector databases for flexibility
Enables multi-agent orchestration and human-in-the-loop for robust systems
Offers both cloud and self-hosted deployment options for versatility
Provides APIs, SDKs, and embeddable widgets for seamless application integration

Cons

GitHub license is 'NOASSERTION', which may raise concerns for some open-source users
Reliance on visual builder might limit highly custom or niche coding requirements
Cloud platform has usage limits on predictions and storage for lower tiers
Requires familiarity with AI concepts and LLM orchestration for advanced use cases
Community support is the primary channel for free and starter users

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Dify

7.5

/ 10

Flowise

7.5

/ 10

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Dify

7.0

Flowise

8.0▲ +1.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Dify

8.0

Flowise

8.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Dify

7.0

Flowise

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Dify

7.0

Flowise

7.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Dify

8.0▲ +1.0

Flowise

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Dify

8.0

Flowise

8.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Dify or Flowise?

Both are strong options. Dify has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Flowise has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Dify cheaper than Flowise?

Dify starts at free (open_source model). Flowise starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Dify and Flowise?

Dify — "Build production-ready AI agents and applications with agentic workflows.". Flowise — "Visually build and deploy AI agents and LLM workflows with ease.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Dify and Flowise together?

Explore Alternatives

Dify Alternatives

Tools similar to Dify

Flowise Alternatives

Tools similar to Flowise

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.