Does Dust or Make have a free plan?

Dust is a paid tool with a free trial. Make is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Dust vs Make

Q: Can I use Dust and Make together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Dust and Make with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

Dust

The Operating System for AI Agents

0.0(0)

PAID

93% data quality

Make

Celonis, Inc.

Visually build and orchestrate AI automation with speed and control

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

96% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Dust

Uptime:99.9%

Users:1K-10K

Customers (per vendor):Blueground, Clay, Assembled +7

GDPR

Too Close to Call

Make (8.2) vs Dust (7.8) — difference of 0.3 points

AI Comparison Summary

Dust

7.8

avg score

Make

8.2

avg score

Make leads overall — particularly in Value for Money and Support & Ecosystem.

Dust has an edge in Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Make

8.2 / 10

Dust

Best For

Enterprise teams automating complex workflows

Organizations needing secure, compliant AI solutions

Departments like Sales, Marketing, and Customer Support seeking efficiency

Engineering teams for code-related automation

Not Ideal For

Individuals or very small teams with limited budget for per-user pricing

Users seeking a simple, single-purpose AI assistant without complex workflows

Organizations that require on-premise deployment only

Make

Best For

Building no-code AI automation workflows for business users

Orchestrating complex multi-app processes for operations teams

Integrating AI into existing business applications

Scaling automation across enterprise departments

Not Ideal For

Deep code-level customization for highly specific integrations

Users who prefer code-first development environments

Simple, single-step automations where a lightweight tool suffices

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Dust is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Make is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.7

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Dust

Pros

Comprehensive multi-agent orchestration capabilities
Strong emphasis on enterprise-grade security and compliance
Model-agnostic, allowing flexibility with various LLMs
Extensive integrations with common business tools
Supports no-code agent creation for non-technical users
Offers regional data hosting options (US/EU)

Cons

Pricing is per user per month, which can scale for large teams
Requires integration and setup with existing company data sources
No explicit mention of mobile platforms for agent interaction
Steep learning curve for advanced custom tool development
Fair use limits apply to 'unlimited messages' in Pro plan

Make

Pros

Visual-first no-code builder for rapid development
Extensive library of 3,000+ pre-built app integrations
Supports autonomous AI agents for dynamic task execution
Real-time visual map provides clarity and control over automations
Strong security and compliance (GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SSO)
Free plan available with no time limit or credit card required

Cons

May have a learning curve for designing complex scenarios
Reliance on pre-built app connectors for non-API integrations
Advanced custom logic might require workarounds or custom app development

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Dust

7.8

/ 10

Make

8.2

/ 10

Your pick

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Dust

7.0

Make

7.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Dust

8.0

Make

8.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Dust

7.0

Make

9.0▲ +2.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Dust

8.0

Make

8.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Dust

7.0

Make

9.0▲ +2.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Dust

10.0▲ +2.0

Make

8.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Dust

Task

Make

8.0

Workflow Building

9.0

7.0

Trigger Variety

8.0

Action Library

10.0

7.0

Error Handling

8.0

6.0

Scheduling Capability

7.0

8.0

Conditional Logic

8.0

9.0

Api Connectivity

9.0

7.0

Monitoring Logging

8.0

9.0

Multi Step Chains

9.0

8.0

Autonomous Execution

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Dust or Make?

Both are strong options. Dust has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Make has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Dust cheaper than Make?

Dust starts at $29/month (paid model) with a free trial. Make starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Dust and Make?

Dust — "The Operating System for AI Agents". Make — "Visually build and orchestrate AI automation with speed and control". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Dust and Make together?

Explore Alternatives

Dust Alternatives

Tools similar to Dust

Make Alternatives

Tools similar to Make

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.