Elicit vs DeepMind AlphaFold
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Trust & Reliability
Elicit
DeepMind AlphaFold
Overall Winner: DeepMind AlphaFold
7.7/10 vs Elicit at 6.7/10
Elicit
6.7
avg score
DeepMind AlphaFold
7.7
avg score
DeepMind AlphaFold leads overall — particularly in Value for Money and Support & Ecosystem.
Overall Winner
DeepMind AlphaFold
Elicit
DeepMind AlphaFold
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Elicit is best for
DeepMind AlphaFold is best for
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
ElicitPros
- Access to a vast database of over 138 million academic papers and 545,000 clinical trials
- Semantic search capabilities find relevant papers even without exact keyword matches
- Generates high-quality, customizable research reports with transparent, sentence-level citations
- Significantly reduces time spent on systematic reviews (up to 80% time savings reported)
- Supports large-scale analysis, processing up to 1,000 papers and 20,000 data points at once
- Offers API access for advanced programmatic integration
- Provides personalized alerts to keep researchers updated on new findings
Cons
- Free plan has limited automated reports (2 per month) and table columns (2 at a time)
- API access and higher rate limits require a paid Pro plan or above
- Full-text access to paywalled papers may require integrating company subscriptions (BYOData)
- The tool primarily focuses on scientific and academic research, which might not be suitable for general-purpose information retrieval
- Reports are long-running operations (5-15 minutes), which might not be ideal for instant answers
DeepMind AlphaFoldPros
- Provides highly accurate protein structure predictions
- Offers open access to a vast database of over 200 million structures
- Freely available for both academic and commercial use under CC-BY-4.0 license
- Includes open-source code for generating custom predictions
- Developed by Google DeepMind and EMBL-EBI, ensuring scientific rigor
Cons
- Database may not contain all desired protein structures, requiring custom prediction
- PAE files require programmatic analysis (Python) for raw data
- Search queries have specific requirements (e.g., min 20 amino acids for sequence search)
- The system still has some limitations in prediction accuracy for certain cases
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Dimension Comparison
Elicit
6.7
/ 10
DeepMind AlphaFold
7.7
/ 10
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Task Performance
Elicit
Task
DeepMind AlphaFold
* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.