Elicit vs Iris.ai
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated May 2026
Trust & Reliability
Elicit
Users:1M-10M
Customers (per vendor):Formation Bio, VDI / VDE, Oxford PharmaGenesis
Iris.ai
Overall Winner: Elicit
6.7/10 vs Iris.ai at 6.2/10
Leads in:
Ease of Use
Customizability
AI Comparison Summary
Elicit
6.7
avg score
Iris.ai
6.2
avg score
Elicit leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Elicit
6.7 / 10
Elicit
Best For
Accelerating literature reviews for scientific researchers
Automating systematic review processes for academic teams
Staying updated on new research in specific fields
Generating structured research reports with evidence
Not Ideal For
General-purpose web search or non-academic information retrieval
Users needing instant, real-time answers for very broad topics outside scientific literature
Creative writing or content generation for marketing/business
Iris.ai
Best For
Augmenting expert knowledge for regulated enterprises
Optimizing literature review processes for R&D teams
Transforming unstructured data into AI-ready insights
Building and scaling Agentic RAG systems for AI application developers
Not Ideal For
Individuals or small teams needing simple, off-the-shelf AI agents
Users without complex, unstructured data challenges
Projects not requiring enterprise-grade security or compliance
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Elicit is best for
💬Chat & Conversation8.0📊Data & Analytics8.0🔍Research8.0
Iris.ai is best for
📊Data & Analytics9.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0🔍Research6.5
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
ElicitPros
- Access to a vast database of over 138 million academic papers and 545,000 clinical trials
- Semantic search capabilities find relevant papers even without exact keyword matches
- Generates high-quality, customizable research reports with transparent, sentence-level citations
- Significantly reduces time spent on systematic reviews (up to 80% time savings reported)
- Supports large-scale analysis, processing up to 1,000 papers and 20,000 data points at once
- Offers API access for advanced programmatic integration
- Provides personalized alerts to keep researchers updated on new findings
Cons
- Free plan has limited automated reports (2 per month) and table columns (2 at a time)
- API access and higher rate limits require a paid Pro plan or above
- Full-text access to paywalled papers may require integrating company subscriptions (BYOData)
- The tool primarily focuses on scientific and academic research, which might not be suitable for general-purpose information retrieval
- Reports are long-running operations (5-15 minutes), which might not be ideal for instant answers
Iris.aiPros
- Transforms unstructured data into structured, machine-readable knowledge up to 60x faster
- Achieves 90%+ precision in data extraction across diverse formats
- Reduces LLM usage costs by 35%+
- Accelerates AI go-to-market by 80%+
- Supports 68+ languages and various document types (PDFs, Word, Excel, images, graphs)
- Offers flexible deployment options including API, cloud, and on-premise
- ISO 27001-certified and GDPR-compliant for robust security and privacy
Cons
- Primarily designed for enterprises, potentially complex for individual users or small teams
- Requires significant data ingestion and setup for optimal performance
- Pricing is tailored for enterprise-grade solutions, not suitable for casual use
- No explicit visual builder for non-technical users, requiring some technical expertise
- No explicit mention of SOC 2 Type II certification
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Elicit
6.7
/ 10
Your pick
Iris.ai
6.2
/ 10
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Elicit
7.0▲ +3.0
Iris.ai
4.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Elicit
8.0
Iris.ai
8.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Elicit
7.0
Iris.ai
7.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Elicit
6.0▲ +1.0
Iris.ai
5.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Elicit
6.0
Iris.ai
6.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Elicit
6.0
Iris.ai
7.0▲ +1.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Task Performance
Elicit
Task
Iris.ai
9.08.0
Literature Search
7.03.0
Citation Management
8.09.0
Data Extraction
5.05.0
Hypothesis Generation
8.07.0
Paper Summarization
6.04.0
Methodology Guidance
7.07.0
Cross Reference
8.08.0
Knowledge Synthesis
2.02.0
Experiment Tracking
6.03.0
Peer Review Support
* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Elicit or Iris.ai?
Both are strong options. Elicit has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Iris.ai has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Elicit cheaper than Iris.ai?
Elicit starts at free (freemium model). Iris.ai starts at free (enterprise model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Elicit and Iris.ai?
Elicit — "AI for Scientific Research to be 10x more evidence-based". Iris.ai — "AI Knowledge Foundation for Regulated Enterprises". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.