Fathom vs Supernormal
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Trust & Reliability
Fathom
Supernormal
Overall Winner: Fathom
7.5/10 vs Supernormal at 6.7/10
Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →
Fathom
7.5
avg score
Supernormal
6.7
avg score
Fathom leads overall — particularly in Integration.
Scores are AI-estimated from publicly available data — not an independent test or a verified user rating. How we rank →
Overall Winner
Fathom
Fathom
Supernormal
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Fathom is best for
Supernormal is best for
Filter by your use case:
Limitations
FathomCons
- Bot-free video capture is currently in limited beta
- Fathom does not record phone calls
- iOS app is still in development
- Windows desktop app is still in development
- Paid plans have limited lookback for "Team Calls" for Ask Fathom feature
- CRM syncs are limited to Max 3 users/domain on some plans
SupernormalCons
- Meeting capture requires desktop app (Mac or Windows)
- Free plan has daily and monthly credit limits
- SOC 2 report, DPA, BAA, and penetration test summary available under NDA only
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Dimension Comparison
Fathom
7.5
/ 10
Supernormal
6.7
/ 10
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow intuitive is onboarding, UI navigation, and day-to-day usage for the target audience?
Customization
CalculatedHow much can users tailor workflows, settings, prompts, or outputs to their needs?
Support
AIHow strong is the documentation, customer support, community, and learning resources?
Integration
CalculatedHow well does it connect with other tools, APIs, and workflows?
Compliance & Data Protection
CalculatedCompliance certifications and data-protection posture, counted from ten verified signals: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliance, HIPAA, WCAG AA/AAA, PII redaction, licensed-only training, a published sub-processor list, a downloadable DPA, not training on user data, and a documented deletion path
Performance
CalculatedLatency + throughput speed
Planning Quality
CalculatedMulti-step planning depth + replanning capability
Calculated = derived from structured signals (integration count, API/open-source config, compliance certs, response-time). AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Task Performance
Fathom
Task
Supernormal
* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.