Does Glean or Typesense have a free plan?

Glean is a paid tool. Typesense is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Glean vs Typesense

Q: Can I use Glean and Typesense together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Glean and Typesense with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

Glean

Give every employee an AI Assistant and Agents that put your company’s knowledge to work.

0.0(0)

ENTERPRISE

91% data quality

Typesense

Typesense, Inc.

Lightning-fast, open-source search engine for instant, relevant results.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

86% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Glean

Users:1K-10K

Customers (per vendor):Plaid, Pinterest, WealthSimple +7

HIPAA

Typesense

Overall Winner: Typesense

7.8/10 vs Glean at 7.0/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Value for Money

Support

AI Comparison Summary

Glean

7.0

avg score

Typesense

7.8

avg score

Typesense leads overall.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Typesense

7.8 / 10

Glean

Best For

Accelerating developer productivity for engineering teams

Resolving customer support incidents faster for service teams

Streamlining account review for sales teams

Automating new hire onboarding for HR departments

Not Ideal For

Individual users or freelancers

Small to medium-sized businesses with limited internal data sources

Users seeking a free or low-cost AI solution

Typesense

Best For

Building instant search-as-you-type experiences

Implementing faceted navigation for e-commerce

Adding geo-search capabilities to applications

Creating semantic search for content platforms

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users needing a plug-and-play search solution without development

Organizations requiring a fully managed, no-code search solution

Users who prefer a GUI-only interface for search configuration

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Glean is best for

✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation7.6🔍Research7.0

Typesense is best for

🔍Research3.7

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Glean

Pros

Unifies knowledge across 100+ enterprise applications via native connectors
Provides a secure and permission-aware AI environment with real-time access controls
Offers both a personal AI assistant and a platform for building custom AI agents
Integrates seamlessly with popular workplace tools like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and GitHub
Demonstrated rapid deployment (3 weeks) and quick ROI (under 6 months) by customers

Cons

Primarily designed for enterprise use, not suitable for individual users or small businesses
Pricing is not publicly disclosed and requires contacting sales for a demo
Requires integration with existing company data sources, which can be a significant undertaking
Advanced agent orchestration may require a deeper understanding of AI concepts

Typesense

Pros

Open-source with a permissive license (GPL-3.0)
Extremely fast search performance (sub-50ms)
Developer-friendly with extensive API libraries for multiple languages
Includes advanced features like vector and semantic search
Offers both self-hosted and managed cloud deployment options
Strong community support via Slack and GitHub

Cons

Requires technical expertise for self-hosting and management
May have a learning curve for those new to search engines
Cloud version has usage-based pricing beyond the free tier
No explicit mention of advanced enterprise features like SCIM provisioning

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Glean

7.0

/ 10

Typesense

7.8

/ 10

Your pick

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Glean

6.0

Typesense

7.0▲ +1.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Glean

8.0

Typesense

9.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Glean

7.0

Typesense

8.0▲ +1.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Glean

6.0

Typesense

7.0▲ +1.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Glean

7.0

Typesense

8.0▲ +1.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Glean

8.0

Typesense

8.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Glean or Typesense?

Both are strong options. Glean has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Typesense has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Glean cheaper than Typesense?

Glean starts at free (enterprise model). Typesense starts at free (open_source model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Glean and Typesense?

Glean — "Give every employee an AI Assistant and Agents that put your company’s knowledge to work.". Typesense — "Lightning-fast, open-source search engine for instant, relevant results.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Glean and Typesense together?

Explore Alternatives

Glean Alternatives

Tools similar to Glean

Typesense Alternatives

Tools similar to Typesense

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.