Does Google ADK or Cursor have a free plan?

Google ADK is a paid tool. Cursor is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Google ADK vs Cursor

Q: Can I use Google ADK and Cursor together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Google ADK and Cursor with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

Google ADK

Google

An open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building sophisticated AI agents.

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

81% data quality

Cursor

Anysphere, Inc.

Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.

0.0(0)

G2 4.7★(20)

FREEMIUM

66% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Google ADK

Trust data not available yet

Cursor

Customers (per vendor):Stripe, OpenAI, Datadog +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Cursor

8.0/10 vs Google ADK at 5.2/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Ease of Use

Customizability

AI Comparison Summary

Google ADK

5.2

avg score

Cursor

8.0

avg score

Cursor leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Output Quality and 2 more.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Cursor

8.0 / 10

Google ADK

Best For

Developing custom AI agents for specific tasks

Building multi-agent orchestration systems

Experimenting with agentic AI workflows

Deploying AI agents with fine-grained control

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking no-code agent builders

Businesses needing a fully managed, hosted agent platform

Users looking for pre-built, off-the-shelf AI agents

Cursor

Best For

Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance

Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles

Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools

Developers working with complex or large codebases

Not Ideal For

Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment

Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations

Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Google ADK is best for

🤖Automation & Agents7.7

Cursor is best for

💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Google ADK

Pros

Open-source and free to use, fostering community contributions
Code-first approach provides maximum flexibility and control for developers
Designed for building sophisticated single and multi-agent systems
Backed by Google, implying robust engineering and potential for future development

Cons

Requires strong Python programming skills, not suitable for non-developers
No visual interface or low-code options for rapid prototyping
Lacks built-in cloud hosting or managed services, requiring self-deployment
Limited explicit integrations mentioned, relying on developer implementation

Cursor

Pros

Significantly boosts developer productivity
Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile

Cons

Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Google ADK

5.2

/ 10

Cursor

8.0

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Google ADK

3.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +5.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Google ADK

7.0

Cursor

9.0▲ +2.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Google ADK

9.0▲ +1.0

Cursor

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Google ADK

5.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +3.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Google ADK

6.0

Cursor

7.0▲ +1.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Google ADK

1.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Google ADK or Cursor?

Both are strong options. Google ADK has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Google ADK cheaper than Cursor?

Google ADK starts at free (open_source model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Google ADK and Cursor?

Google ADK — "An open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building sophisticated AI agents.". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Google ADK and Cursor together?

Explore Alternatives

Google ADK Alternatives

Tools similar to Google ADK

Cursor Alternatives

Tools similar to Cursor

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.