Does Inngest Agent or Cursor have a free plan?

Inngest Agent is available for free. Cursor is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Inngest Agent vs Cursor

Q: Can I use Inngest Agent and Cursor together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Inngest Agent and Cursor with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

Inngest Agent

Inngest Inc.

Make any code durable by default for reliable workflows and AI agents

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

92% data quality

Cursor

Anysphere

Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.

0.0(0)

G2 4.5★(24)

FREEMIUM

80% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Inngest Agent

Customers (per vendor):Replit, SoundCloud, Cohere +7

SOC 2

Cursor

Uptime:99.62%Status page

Overall Winner: Cursor

8.0/10 vs Inngest Agent at 7.0/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Ease of Use

Value for Money

AI Comparison Summary

Inngest Agent

7.0

avg score

Cursor

8.0

avg score

Cursor leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Cursor

8.0 / 10

Inngest Agent

Best For

Building reliable AI agents and multi-step workflows for developers

Orchestrating complex event-driven systems for engineering teams

Automating background jobs and scheduled tasks for serverless applications

Ensuring fault tolerance and recovery for critical business logic

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code workflow automation solution

Simple, single-step tasks that do not require durability or complex orchestration

Users who prefer visual drag-and-drop workflow builders over code-first approaches

Cursor

Best For

Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance

Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles

Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools

Developers working with complex or large codebases

Not Ideal For

Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment

Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations

Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Inngest Agent is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Cursor is best for

💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Inngest Agent

Pros

Eliminates the need to manage queues, workers, and complex infrastructure
Provides automatic retries and state management for fault-tolerant execution
Offers deep observability with real-time traces and structured logs for debugging
Supports multiple programming languages (TypeScript, Python, Go, Kotlin) with native SDKs
Enables advanced flow control features like concurrency, throttling, and prioritization
Designed for low-latency execution with Checkpointing for real-time AI workflows

Cons

Primarily targets developers and requires coding knowledge, no visual builder
Advanced features like metrics export and SSO are limited to paid or enterprise plans
Requires integration with external LLMs and tools, as it is an orchestration layer
Self-hosting with Postgres is currently experimental

Cursor

Pros

Significantly boosts developer productivity
Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile

Cons

Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Inngest Agent

7.0

/ 10

Cursor

8.0

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Inngest Agent

6.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +2.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Inngest Agent

8.0

Cursor

9.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Inngest Agent

7.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +1.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Inngest Agent

9.0▲ +1.0

Cursor

8.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Inngest Agent

7.0

Cursor

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Inngest Agent

5.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +3.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Inngest Agent or Cursor?

Both are strong options. Inngest Agent has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Inngest Agent cheaper than Cursor?

Inngest Agent starts at free (freemium model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Inngest Agent and Cursor?

Inngest Agent — "Make any code durable by default for reliable workflows and AI agents". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Inngest Agent and Cursor together?

Explore Alternatives

Inngest Agent Alternatives

Tools similar to Inngest Agent

Cursor Alternatives

Tools similar to Cursor

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.