Can I use Inngest Agent and Trigger.dev together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Inngest Agent and Trigger.dev with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Does Inngest Agent or Trigger.dev have a free plan?

Inngest Agent is available for free. Trigger.dev is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Inngest Agent vs Trigger.dev

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

Inngest Agent

Inngest Inc.

Make any code durable by default for reliable workflows and AI agents

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

92% data quality

Trigger.dev

API Hero Ltd

Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Inngest Agent

Customers (per vendor):Replit, SoundCloud, Cohere +7

SOC 2

Trigger.dev

Uptime:99%Status page

Overall Winner: Trigger.dev

8.2/10 vs Inngest Agent at 7.0/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Value for Money

Support

AI Comparison Summary

Inngest Agent

7.0

avg score

Trigger.dev

8.2

avg score

Trigger.dev leads overall — particularly in Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Trigger.dev

8.2 / 10

Inngest Agent

Best For

Building reliable AI agents and multi-step workflows for developers

Orchestrating complex event-driven systems for engineering teams

Automating background jobs and scheduled tasks for serverless applications

Ensuring fault tolerance and recovery for critical business logic

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code workflow automation solution

Simple, single-step tasks that do not require durability or complex orchestration

Users who prefer visual drag-and-drop workflow builders over code-first approaches

Trigger.dev

Best For

Building production-ready AI agents for developers

Orchestrating complex multi-step AI workflows

Automating long-running background jobs without timeouts

Integrating AI capabilities into existing TypeScript applications

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code workflow builder

Teams requiring deterministic replay across multiple programming languages (e.g., Go, Java, Python, Ruby, Swift)

Simple, single-step automation tasks that don't require durability or complex orchestration

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Inngest Agent is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Trigger.dev is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.7

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Inngest Agent

Pros

Eliminates the need to manage queues, workers, and complex infrastructure
Provides automatic retries and state management for fault-tolerant execution
Offers deep observability with real-time traces and structured logs for debugging
Supports multiple programming languages (TypeScript, Python, Go, Kotlin) with native SDKs
Enables advanced flow control features like concurrency, throttling, and prioritization
Designed for low-latency execution with Checkpointing for real-time AI workflows

Cons

Primarily targets developers and requires coding knowledge, no visual builder
Advanced features like metrics export and SSO are limited to paid or enterprise plans
Requires integration with external LLMs and tools, as it is an orchestration layer
Self-hosting with Postgres is currently experimental

Trigger.dev

Pros

Open-source and self-hostable with Apache 2.0 license
TypeScript-native development experience with minimal boilerplate
Managed infrastructure handles scaling, retries, and queues automatically
Comprehensive observability and monitoring with real-time tracing
Supports human-in-the-loop workflows and real-time frontend updates
Flexible build extensions for custom tooling and system packages

Cons

Primarily focused on TypeScript, less native support for other languages compared to alternatives
Requires coding knowledge; no visual builder for non-developers
Managed service incurs usage-based costs beyond free tier
Not designed for polyglot enterprise orchestration requiring deterministic replay across many languages

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Inngest Agent

7.0

/ 10

Trigger.dev

8.2

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Inngest Agent

6.0

Trigger.dev

7.0▲ +1.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Inngest Agent

8.0

Trigger.dev

9.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Inngest Agent

7.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +1.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Inngest Agent

9.0

Trigger.dev

9.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Inngest Agent

7.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +1.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Inngest Agent

5.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +3.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Inngest Agent

Task

Trigger.dev

8.0

Workflow Building

9.0

7.0

Trigger Variety

7.0

Action Library

8.0

9.0

Error Handling

10.0

7.0

Scheduling Capability

9.0

8.0

Conditional Logic

8.0

Api Connectivity

9.0

Monitoring Logging

10.0

9.0

Multi Step Chains

9.0

8.0

Autonomous Execution

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Inngest Agent or Trigger.dev?

Both are strong options. Inngest Agent has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Trigger.dev has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Inngest Agent cheaper than Trigger.dev?

Inngest Agent starts at free (freemium model). Trigger.dev starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Inngest Agent and Trigger.dev?

Inngest Agent — "Make any code durable by default for reliable workflows and AI agents". Trigger.dev — "Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Explore Alternatives

Inngest Agent Alternatives

Tools similar to Inngest Agent

Trigger.dev Alternatives

Tools similar to Trigger.dev

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.