Letta vs Cursor
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated June 2026
Trust & Reliability
Letta
Customers (per vendor):Bilt Rewards, 11x, Hunt Club +1
GDPR
Cursor
Customers (per vendor):Stripe, OpenAI, Datadog +7
GDPR
Overall Winner: Cursor
8.0/10 vs Letta at 7.2/10
Leads in:
Output Quality
Ease of Use
Value for Money
AI Comparison Summary
Letta
7.2
avg score
Cursor
8.0
avg score
Cursor leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Cursor
8.0 / 10
Letta
Best For
Building self-improving AI agents for personalized experiences
Developing memory-augmented coding agents for local tasks
Creating multi-agent systems with shared and archival memory
Integrating stateful AI agents into custom applications
Not Ideal For
Non-technical users seeking no-code agent solutions
Users who prefer fully managed, black-box AI services
Simple, stateless chatbot implementations
Cursor
Best For
Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance
Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles
Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools
Developers working with complex or large codebases
Not Ideal For
Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment
Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations
Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Letta is best for
🤖Automation & Agents7.7
Cursor is best for
💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
LettaPros
- Memory-first architecture enables truly persistent and learning agents
- Model-agnostic, allowing users to connect their own LLM API keys
- Open-source core project fosters transparency and community contributions
- Portable agent memory and conversation histories across models and providers
- Supports local execution via CLI and desktop app for privacy and control
- Comprehensive SDKs for Python and TypeScript for easy integration
Cons
- Requires Node.js and npm for CLI installation, implying developer-centric usage
- Desktop app currently only available for MacOS, limiting platform access
- Server-side tool execution incurs credit costs, requiring budget management
- Advanced features like programmatic tool calling and context engineering require technical expertise
- No visual builder or low-code interface for non-developers
CursorPros
- Significantly boosts developer productivity
- Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
- Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
- Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
- Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
- Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile
Cons
- Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
- Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
- Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
- Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
- No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Letta
7.2
/ 10
Cursor
8.0
/ 10
Your pick
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Letta
4.0
Cursor
8.0▲ +4.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Letta
8.0
Cursor
9.0▲ +1.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Letta
7.0
Cursor
8.0▲ +1.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Letta
9.0▲ +1.0
Cursor
8.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Letta
7.0
Cursor
7.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Letta
8.0
Cursor
8.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Letta or Cursor?
Both are strong options. Letta has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Letta cheaper than Cursor?
Letta starts at free (freemium model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Letta and Cursor?
Letta — "Build deeply personalized AI agents that remember, learn, and evolve.". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.