Letta vs Qodo
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.
Updated June 2026
Trust & Reliability
Letta
Customers (per vendor):Bilt Rewards, 11x, Hunt Club +1
GDPR
Qodo
Users:1M-10M
Overall Winner: Qodo
7.7/10 vs Letta at 7.2/10
Leads in:
Output Quality
Ease of Use
AI Comparison Summary
Letta
7.2
avg score
Qodo
7.7
avg score
Qodo leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use.
Based on 6 dimensions
How scores are calculatedOverall Winner
Qodo
7.7 / 10
Letta
Best For
Building self-improving AI agents for personalized experiences
Developing memory-augmented coding agents for local tasks
Creating multi-agent systems with shared and archival memory
Integrating stateful AI agents into custom applications
Not Ideal For
Non-technical users seeking no-code agent solutions
Users who prefer fully managed, black-box AI services
Simple, stateless chatbot implementations
Qodo
Best For
Automating code reviews for large engineering teams
Enforcing coding standards and compliance across distributed systems
Reducing pull request backlogs and accelerating delivery
Improving code quality and reliability in complex codebases
Not Ideal For
Individuals or small teams not focused on code quality or compliance
Users seeking a general-purpose AI code generation tool
Teams that prefer entirely manual code review processes
* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology
Letta is best for
🤖Automation & Agents7.7
Qodo is best for
✍️Writing & Content10.0💬Chat & Conversation10.0🤖Automation & Agents9.0
Filter by your use case:
Pros & Cons
LettaPros
- Memory-first architecture enables truly persistent and learning agents
- Model-agnostic, allowing users to connect their own LLM API keys
- Open-source core project fosters transparency and community contributions
- Portable agent memory and conversation histories across models and providers
- Supports local execution via CLI and desktop app for privacy and control
- Comprehensive SDKs for Python and TypeScript for easy integration
Cons
- Requires Node.js and npm for CLI installation, implying developer-centric usage
- Desktop app currently only available for MacOS, limiting platform access
- Server-side tool execution incurs credit costs, requiring budget management
- Advanced features like programmatic tool calling and context engineering require technical expertise
- No visual builder or low-code interface for non-developers
QodoPros
- Outperforms other AI code review tools in precision and recall benchmarks
- Provides deep, multi-repository context for comprehensive analysis
- Offers flexible deployment options including on-premise and air-gapped for enterprises
- Integrates seamlessly with major Git platforms and IDEs
- SOC 2 Type II certified for robust security and compliance
- Significantly reduces developer hours spent on manual code review
Cons
- Free tier has limited monthly PRs and credits per user
- Free tier user data is utilized for model enhancement (opt-out available)
- Community support is only available for the free tier
- Advanced features like SSO and custom deployment are exclusive to enterprise plans
- No explicit mention of support for external AI agent frameworks
Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You
Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.
Quick profiles:
Ease of Use5
Output Quality5
Value for Money5
Customizability5
Support & Ecosystem5
Integration Power5
Dimension Comparison
Letta
7.2
/ 10
Qodo
7.7
/ 10
Your pick
Dimension Breakdown
Ease of Use
AIHow easy it is to get started and use daily
Letta
4.0
Qodo
7.0▲ +3.0
Output Quality
AIQuality and accuracy of generated results
Letta
8.0
Qodo
9.0▲ +1.0
Value for Money
AICost vs. features and output quality
Letta
7.0
Qodo
7.0
Customizability
CalculatedAbility to tailor to specific needs
Letta
9.0
Qodo
9.0
Support & Ecosystem
AIDocumentation, community, and support quality
Letta
7.0▲ +1.0
Qodo
6.0
Integration Power
CalculatedAbility to connect with other tools and workflows
Letta
8.0
Qodo
8.0
Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology
Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Letta or Qodo?
Both are strong options. Letta has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Qodo has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.
Is Letta cheaper than Qodo?
Letta starts at free (freemium model). Qodo starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.
What are the main differences between Letta and Qodo?
Letta — "Build deeply personalized AI agents that remember, learn, and evolve.". Qodo — "Automated, context-aware AI code review for complex codebases.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.