Does Llama or LightOn have a free plan?

Llama is available for free. LightOn is a paid tool. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Llama vs LightOn

Q: Can I use Llama and LightOn together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Llama and LightOn with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Llama

LightOn

Secure AI Search & Reasoning for Enterprise Data

0.0(0)

PAID

91% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Llama

Users:10M+

LightOn

Customers (per vendor):Safran, Babbar, Region Ile De France

GDPR

Overall Winner: LightOn

6.7/10 vs Llama at 5.7/10

Leads in:

Ease of Use

Customizability

Integrations

AI Comparison Summary

Llama

5.7

avg score

LightOn

6.7

avg score

LightOn leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Integration Power.

Llama has an edge in Value for Money.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

LightOn

6.7 / 10

Llama

Best For

Developing AI-powered applications

Conducting AI research and experimentation

Building custom large language models

Integrating advanced natural language capabilities

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a ready-to-use AI chatbot

Users without programming or machine learning experience

Simple, out-of-the-box content generation without customization

LightOn

Best For

Implementing secure AI search on internal knowledge bases

Automating RFP responses with reliable content

Powering self-service customer support portals

Developing AI-powered internal assistants

Not Ideal For

Individuals or small teams seeking a free or low-cost AI search solution

Users who prefer fully managed SaaS solutions without data residency concerns

Organizations without significant internal IT resources for deployment and management

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Llama is best for

✍️Writing & Content8.0💬Chat & Conversation8.0💻Coding & Dev7.0

LightOn is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Llama

Pros

Openly available for research and commercial use
Backed by Meta AI's research
Offers various model sizes for flexibility
Strong community support due to open nature

Cons

Requires technical expertise for deployment and fine-tuning
Performance depends on hardware resources
May require significant data for fine-tuning specific tasks

LightOn

Pros

Ensures zero data exfiltration with on-premise or sovereign cloud deployment
Handles massive, multimodal unstructured data including complex formats like images and diagrams
Supports advanced search behaviors like conversational Q&A and agentic reasoning
Mirrors native permissions (ACLs) for strict data governance and segregation
Offers both API for developers and ready-to-use white-label interface for business teams
GDPR compliant and SOC 2 Type 1 compliant

Cons

Requires significant hardware (GPU) investment for on-premise deployment
SOC 2 Type 1 is mentioned, not Type II certification
Deployment takes about three weeks, which might be long for some use cases
No explicit mention of a free tier or transparent pricing

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Llama

5.7

/ 10

LightOn

6.7

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Llama

3.0

LightOn

6.0▲ +3.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Llama

8.0

LightOn

8.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Llama

10.0▲ +3.0

LightOn

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Llama

5.0

LightOn

6.0▲ +1.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Llama

7.0

LightOn

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Llama

1.0

LightOn

6.0▲ +5.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Llama

Task

LightOn

8.0

Code Completion

2.0

7.0

Bug Detection

2.0

7.0

Code Explanation

2.0

7.0

Refactoring

2.0

6.0

Test Generation

2.0

7.0

Multi Language Support

2.0

8.0

Context Understanding

9.0

7.0

Documentation Generation

2.0

7.0

Performance Optimization

2.0

5.0

Security Scanning

2.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Llama or LightOn?

Both are strong options. Llama has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while LightOn has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Llama cheaper than LightOn?

Llama starts at free (freemium model). LightOn starts at free (paid model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Llama and LightOn?

Llama — "A family of open large language models designed for developers.". LightOn — "Secure AI Search & Reasoning for Enterprise Data". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Llama and LightOn together?

Explore Alternatives

Llama Alternatives

Tools similar to Llama

LightOn Alternatives

Tools similar to LightOn

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.