Does Mentat or Kiro have a free plan?

Mentat is available for free. Kiro is available for free with a free trial. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Mentat vs Kiro

Q: Can I use Mentat and Kiro together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Mentat and Kiro with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Mentat

AbanteAI

The cloud-native coding agent for GitHub

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

88% data quality

Kiro

Amazon Web Services

Agentic AI development from prototype to production

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

93% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Mentat

Users:10K-100K

Kiro

Users:100K-1M

Customers (per vendor):Mondelez, Hughes Network Systems, Rackspace +3

Too Close to Call

Kiro (6.7) vs Mentat (6.3) — difference of 0.3 points

AI Comparison Summary

Mentat

6.3

avg score

Kiro

6.7

avg score

Kiro leads overall — particularly in Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Kiro

6.7 / 10

Mentat

Best For

Software developers

Engineering teams

Open-source project maintainers

Teams using GitHub for version control

Not Ideal For

Non-coding related tasks or general content generation

Teams not using GitHub for version control

Highly sensitive projects requiring strict on-premise deployment

Kiro

Best For

Software developers

Development teams

Cloud architects

Data scientists

Not Ideal For

Users who prefer purely visual or no-code development environments

Teams requiring immediate extensive multi-language support for agent interactions

Non-technical users without coding knowledge

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Mentat is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research8.0

Kiro is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🤖Automation & Agents9.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Mentat

Pros

Seamless GitHub integration
Automates common development bottlenecks
Scalable for managing multiple projects/agents
Provides a powerful web-based coding environment
Accessible from mobile devices for on-the-go management
Reduces manual effort in code review and debugging

Cons

Primarily focused on coding tasks, not general AI assistance
Requires integration with GitHub, limiting use for other VCS
Reliance on external AI models (Anthropic, OpenAI) for core intelligence
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment options
Limited information on advanced customization beyond scripts

Kiro

Pros

Brings structure to AI coding workflows
Accelerates development velocity by up to 10x
Ensures precise context and explicit intent with specs
Automates bug fixes and feature iteration
Generates documentation and unit tests automatically
Supports multimodal inputs for design guidance
Offers granular control with agent steering and hooks
Compatible with existing VS Code environments
Provides enterprise-grade security and privacy
Lowers the barrier to entry for complex projects

Cons

Currently optimized for English language conversations
Requires local installation and terminal interaction
May have a learning curve for spec-driven development
No explicit public API for Kiro itself

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Mentat

6.3

/ 10

Kiro

6.7

/ 10

Your pick

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Mentat

7.0▲ +1.0

Kiro

6.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Mentat

8.0

Kiro

8.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Mentat

7.0

Kiro

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Mentat

5.0▲ +1.0

Kiro

4.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Mentat

7.0

Kiro

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Mentat

4.0

Kiro

8.0▲ +4.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Mentat

Task

Kiro

7.0

Code Completion

7.0

8.0

Bug Detection

8.0

7.0

Code Explanation

7.0

8.0

Refactoring

7.0

Test Generation

8.0

6.0

Multi Language Support

9.0

Context Understanding

9.0

6.0

Documentation Generation

8.0

7.0

Performance Optimization

7.0

5.0

Security Scanning

6.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Mentat or Kiro?

Both are strong options. Mentat has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Kiro has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Mentat cheaper than Kiro?

Mentat starts at free (freemium model). Kiro starts at free (freemium model) with a free trial. Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Mentat and Kiro?

Mentat — "The cloud-native coding agent for GitHub". Kiro — "Agentic AI development from prototype to production". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Mentat and Kiro together?

Explore Alternatives

Mentat Alternatives

Tools similar to Mentat

Kiro Alternatives

Tools similar to Kiro

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.