Does Mentat or OpenHands have a free plan?

Mentat is available for free. OpenHands is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

Mentat vs OpenHands

Q: Can I use Mentat and OpenHands together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine Mentat and OpenHands with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated May 2026

Mentat

AbanteAI

The cloud-native coding agent for GitHub

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

88% data quality

OpenHands

All Hands AI

The open platform for cloud coding agents.

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

91% data quality

Trust & Reliability

Mentat

Users:10K-100K

OpenHands

Users:1M-10M

Customers (per vendor):TikTok, Vmware, Roche +7

Overall Winner: OpenHands

7.3/10 vs Mentat at 6.3/10

Leads in:

Customizability

Value for Money

Integrations

AI Comparison Summary

Mentat

6.3

avg score

OpenHands

7.3

avg score

OpenHands leads overall — particularly in Customizability and Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

OpenHands

7.3 / 10

Mentat

Best For

Software developers

Engineering teams

Open-source project maintainers

Teams using GitHub for version control

Not Ideal For

Non-coding related tasks or general content generation

Teams not using GitHub for version control

Highly sensitive projects requiring strict on-premise deployment

OpenHands

Best For

Reducing engineering toil

Speeding up code reviews

Expanding test coverage

Automating documentation and release notes

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users without coding knowledge

Simple, one-off automation tasks that don't require autonomous reasoning

Highly creative content generation outside of code and documentation

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

Mentat is best for

✍️Writing & Content9.0💬Chat & Conversation9.0🔍Research8.0

OpenHands is best for

🔍Research8.0💻Coding & Dev7.4✍️Writing & Content7.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

Mentat

Pros

Seamless GitHub integration
Automates common development bottlenecks
Scalable for managing multiple projects/agents
Provides a powerful web-based coding environment
Accessible from mobile devices for on-the-go management
Reduces manual effort in code review and debugging

Cons

Primarily focused on coding tasks, not general AI assistance
Requires integration with GitHub, limiting use for other VCS
Reliance on external AI models (Anthropic, OpenAI) for core intelligence
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment options
Limited information on advanced customization beyond scripts

OpenHands

Pros

Open source and transparent by design
Model-agnostic, allowing use of any LLM
Flexible deployment options (local, cloud, self-hosted)
Secure, containerized sandbox runtime
Extensible SDK for custom agent development
Integrates with popular developer tools (Git, Jira, Slack)
Scalable for individual tasks to thousands of parallel runs
Supports human-in-the-loop for review and approval

Cons

Requires technical expertise for setup and customization
May require managing own LLM keys for cost efficiency
Performance can depend on the chosen LLM and infrastructure
Not ideal for non-coding or highly creative tasks

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

Mentat

6.3

/ 10

OpenHands

7.3

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

Mentat

7.0▲ +1.0

OpenHands

6.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

Mentat

8.0▲ +1.0

OpenHands

7.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

Mentat

7.0

OpenHands

8.0▲ +1.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

Mentat

5.0

OpenHands

9.0▲ +4.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

Mentat

7.0

OpenHands

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

Mentat

4.0

OpenHands

7.0▲ +3.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

Mentat

Task

OpenHands

7.0

Code Completion

7.0

8.0

Bug Detection

7.0

Code Explanation

7.0

8.0

Refactoring

8.0

7.0

Test Generation

7.0

6.0

Multi Language Support

7.0

9.0

Context Understanding

7.0

6.0

Documentation Generation

8.0

7.0

Performance Optimization

7.0

5.0

Security Scanning

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Mentat or OpenHands?

Both are strong options. Mentat has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while OpenHands has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is Mentat cheaper than OpenHands?

Mentat starts at free (freemium model). OpenHands starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between Mentat and OpenHands?

Mentat — "The cloud-native coding agent for GitHub". OpenHands — "The open platform for cloud coding agents.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use Mentat and OpenHands together?

Explore Alternatives

Mentat Alternatives

Tools similar to Mentat

OpenHands Alternatives

Tools similar to OpenHands

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.