Does AutoGen or Cursor have a free plan?

AutoGen is a paid tool. Cursor is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

AutoGen vs Cursor

Q: Can I use AutoGen and Cursor together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine AutoGen and Cursor with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

AutoGen

Microsoft

Build and orchestrate multi-agent AI systems with conversational capabilities

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

83% data quality

Cursor

Anysphere, Inc.

Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.

0.0(0)

G2 4.7★(20)

FREEMIUM

66% data quality

Trust & Reliability

AutoGen

Users:100K-1M

Cursor

Customers (per vendor):Stripe, OpenAI, Datadog +7

GDPR

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Cursor

8.0/10 vs AutoGen at 6.0/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Ease of Use

Integrations

AI Comparison Summary

AutoGen

6.0

avg score

Cursor

8.0

avg score

Cursor leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Cursor

8.0 / 10

AutoGen

Best For

Building autonomous AI agents for developers

Orchestrating multi-step AI workflows for engineers

Developing conversational AI applications with tool use

Experimenting with agentic AI paradigms for researchers

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking no-code agent solutions

Simple, single-turn chatbot implementations

Users without Python programming experience

Cursor

Best For

Individual developers seeking AI-powered coding assistance

Engineering teams aiming to accelerate development cycles

Organizations needing advanced code review and debugging tools

Developers working with complex or large codebases

Not Ideal For

Beginner programmers who prefer a simpler, non-AI-assisted environment

Teams strictly requiring on-premise or fully self-hosted AI models for all operations

Users who prefer a lightweight text editor over a full-featured IDE

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

AutoGen is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Cursor is best for

💻Coding & Dev10.0🤖Automation & Agents7.0✍️Writing & Content3.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

AutoGen

Pros

Open-source and backed by Microsoft, fostering community contributions
Highly flexible framework for building diverse agentic AI applications
Supports multi-agent conversations for complex problem-solving
Enables seamless integration of tools and human feedback into workflows
Compatible with various LLM providers, avoiding vendor lock-in

Cons

Requires strong programming skills (Python) for implementation
Steep learning curve for those new to multi-agent systems
No visual interface or low-code options for non-developers
Performance and cost depend heavily on the chosen LLM and task complexity

Cursor

Pros

Significantly boosts developer productivity
Deep codebase understanding for accurate AI assistance
Supports a wide range of cutting-edge AI models
Integrates seamlessly into existing developer workflows (GitHub, Slack)
Offers robust enterprise-grade security and compliance features
Provides flexible deployment across desktop, CLI, web, and mobile

Cons

Requires developers to adapt to an AI-first IDE workflow
Advanced features and integrations are primarily for paid tiers
Reliance on external LLM providers for core AI capabilities
Potential for high switching costs due to deep integration into development environment
No explicit mention of on-premise deployment for core product

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

AutoGen

6.0

/ 10

Cursor

8.0

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

AutoGen

3.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +5.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

AutoGen

8.0

Cursor

9.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

AutoGen

9.0▲ +1.0

Cursor

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

AutoGen

8.0

Cursor

8.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

AutoGen

7.0

Cursor

7.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

AutoGen

1.0

Cursor

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, AutoGen or Cursor?

Both are strong options. AutoGen has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Cursor has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is AutoGen cheaper than Cursor?

AutoGen starts at free (open_source model). Cursor starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between AutoGen and Cursor?

AutoGen — "Build and orchestrate multi-agent AI systems with conversational capabilities". Cursor — "Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use AutoGen and Cursor together?

Explore Alternatives

AutoGen Alternatives

Tools similar to AutoGen

Cursor Alternatives

Tools similar to Cursor

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.