Does AutoGen or Qodo have a free plan?

AutoGen is a paid tool. Qodo is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

AutoGen vs Qodo

Q: Can I use AutoGen and Qodo together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine AutoGen and Qodo with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

AutoGen

Microsoft

Build and orchestrate multi-agent AI systems with conversational capabilities

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

83% data quality

Qodo

Automated, context-aware AI code review for complex codebases.

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Trust & Reliability

AutoGen

Users:100K-1M

Qodo

Users:1M-10M

Customers (per vendor):Intel, Hi Bob, Inc., Percepto +7

SOC 2

Overall Winner: Qodo

7.7/10 vs AutoGen at 6.0/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Customizability

Integrations

AI Comparison Summary

AutoGen

6.0

avg score

Qodo

7.7

avg score

Qodo leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Integration Power.

AutoGen has an edge in Value for Money.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Qodo

7.7 / 10

AutoGen

Best For

Building autonomous AI agents for developers

Orchestrating multi-step AI workflows for engineers

Developing conversational AI applications with tool use

Experimenting with agentic AI paradigms for researchers

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking no-code agent solutions

Simple, single-turn chatbot implementations

Users without Python programming experience

Qodo

Best For

Automating code reviews for large engineering teams

Enforcing coding standards and compliance across distributed systems

Reducing pull request backlogs and accelerating delivery

Improving code quality and reliability in complex codebases

Not Ideal For

Individuals or small teams not focused on code quality or compliance

Users seeking a general-purpose AI code generation tool

Teams that prefer entirely manual code review processes

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

AutoGen is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Qodo is best for

✍️Writing & Content10.0💬Chat & Conversation10.0🤖Automation & Agents9.0

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

AutoGen

Pros

Open-source and backed by Microsoft, fostering community contributions
Highly flexible framework for building diverse agentic AI applications
Supports multi-agent conversations for complex problem-solving
Enables seamless integration of tools and human feedback into workflows
Compatible with various LLM providers, avoiding vendor lock-in

Cons

Requires strong programming skills (Python) for implementation
Steep learning curve for those new to multi-agent systems
No visual interface or low-code options for non-developers
Performance and cost depend heavily on the chosen LLM and task complexity

Qodo

Pros

Outperforms other AI code review tools in precision and recall benchmarks
Provides deep, multi-repository context for comprehensive analysis
Offers flexible deployment options including on-premise and air-gapped for enterprises
Integrates seamlessly with major Git platforms and IDEs
SOC 2 Type II certified for robust security and compliance
Significantly reduces developer hours spent on manual code review

Cons

Free tier has limited monthly PRs and credits per user
Free tier user data is utilized for model enhancement (opt-out available)
Community support is only available for the free tier
Advanced features like SSO and custom deployment are exclusive to enterprise plans
No explicit mention of support for external AI agent frameworks

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

AutoGen

6.0

/ 10

Qodo

7.7

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

AutoGen

3.0

Qodo

7.0▲ +4.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

AutoGen

8.0

Qodo

9.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

AutoGen

9.0▲ +2.0

Qodo

7.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

AutoGen

8.0

Qodo

9.0▲ +1.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

AutoGen

7.0▲ +1.0

Qodo

6.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

AutoGen

1.0

Qodo

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, AutoGen or Qodo?

Both are strong options. AutoGen has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Qodo has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is AutoGen cheaper than Qodo?

AutoGen starts at free (open_source model). Qodo starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between AutoGen and Qodo?

AutoGen — "Build and orchestrate multi-agent AI systems with conversational capabilities". Qodo — "Automated, context-aware AI code review for complex codebases.". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use AutoGen and Qodo together?

Explore Alternatives

AutoGen Alternatives

Tools similar to AutoGen

Qodo Alternatives

Tools similar to Qodo

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.