Does AutoGen or Trigger.dev have a free plan?

AutoGen is a paid tool. Trigger.dev is available for free. Always verify current pricing directly with the vendor.

AutoGen vs Trigger.dev

Q: Can I use AutoGen and Trigger.dev together?

Yes, many teams use both tools together for different purposes. Use the Stack Builder section above to combine AutoGen and Trigger.dev with other tools and save your AI toolkit.

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, performance, and more.

Updated June 2026

AutoGen

Microsoft

Build and orchestrate multi-agent AI systems with conversational capabilities

0.0(0)

OPEN_SOURCE

83% data quality

Trigger.dev

API Hero Ltd

Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript

0.0(0)

FREEMIUM

94% data quality

Trust & Reliability

AutoGen

Users:100K-1M

Trigger.dev

Uptime:99%Status page

Users:10K-100K

Overall Winner: Trigger.dev

8.2/10 vs AutoGen at 6.0/10

Leads in:

Output Quality

Customizability

Support

AI Comparison Summary

AutoGen

6.0

avg score

Trigger.dev

8.2

avg score

Trigger.dev leads overall — particularly in Ease of Use and Integration Power.

Based on 6 dimensions

How scores are calculated

Overall Winner

Trigger.dev

8.2 / 10

AutoGen

Best For

Building autonomous AI agents for developers

Orchestrating multi-step AI workflows for engineers

Developing conversational AI applications with tool use

Experimenting with agentic AI paradigms for researchers

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking no-code agent solutions

Simple, single-turn chatbot implementations

Users without Python programming experience

Trigger.dev

Best For

Building production-ready AI agents for developers

Orchestrating complex multi-step AI workflows

Automating long-running background jobs without timeouts

Integrating AI capabilities into existing TypeScript applications

Not Ideal For

Non-technical users seeking a no-code workflow builder

Teams requiring deterministic replay across multiple programming languages (e.g., Go, Java, Python, Ruby, Swift)

Simple, single-step automation tasks that don't require durability or complex orchestration

* Verdict is based on our algorithmic scoring of publicly available data. Learn about our methodology

AutoGen is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.3

Trigger.dev is best for

🤖Automation & Agents8.7

Filter by your use case:

Pros & Cons

AutoGen

Pros

Open-source and backed by Microsoft, fostering community contributions
Highly flexible framework for building diverse agentic AI applications
Supports multi-agent conversations for complex problem-solving
Enables seamless integration of tools and human feedback into workflows
Compatible with various LLM providers, avoiding vendor lock-in

Cons

Requires strong programming skills (Python) for implementation
Steep learning curve for those new to multi-agent systems
No visual interface or low-code options for non-developers
Performance and cost depend heavily on the chosen LLM and task complexity

Trigger.dev

Pros

Open-source and self-hostable with Apache 2.0 license
TypeScript-native development experience with minimal boilerplate
Managed infrastructure handles scaling, retries, and queues automatically
Comprehensive observability and monitoring with real-time tracing
Supports human-in-the-loop workflows and real-time frontend updates
Flexible build extensions for custom tooling and system packages

Cons

Primarily focused on TypeScript, less native support for other languages compared to alternatives
Requires coding knowledge; no visual builder for non-developers
Managed service incurs usage-based costs beyond free tier
Not designed for polyglot enterprise orchestration requiring deterministic replay across many languages

Weighted Score — Adjust What Matters to You

Pick a profile or drag sliders — scores and radar update instantly on the right.

Quick profiles:

Ease of Use5

Output Quality5

Value for Money5

Customizability5

Support & Ecosystem5

Integration Power5

Dimension Comparison

AutoGen

6.0

/ 10

Trigger.dev

8.2

/ 10

Clear winner

Dimension Breakdown

Ease of Use

How easy it is to get started and use daily

AutoGen

3.0

Trigger.dev

7.0▲ +4.0

Output Quality

Quality and accuracy of generated results

AutoGen

8.0

Trigger.dev

9.0▲ +1.0

Value for Money

Cost vs. features and output quality

AutoGen

9.0▲ +1.0

Trigger.dev

8.0

Customizability

Calculated

Ability to tailor to specific needs

AutoGen

8.0

Trigger.dev

9.0▲ +1.0

Support & Ecosystem

Documentation, community, and support quality

AutoGen

7.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +1.0

Integration Power

Calculated

Ability to connect with other tools and workflows

AutoGen

1.0

Trigger.dev

8.0▲ +7.0

Calculated = derived from verified integration count and API/open-source signals. AI = LLM-assessed from public website content. Methodology

Task Performance

AutoGen

Task

Trigger.dev

8.0

Workflow Building

9.0

5.0

Trigger Variety

7.0

Action Library

8.0

6.0

Error Handling

10.0

3.0

Scheduling Capability

9.0

7.0

Conditional Logic

8.0

Api Connectivity

9.0

6.0

Monitoring Logging

10.0

9.0

Multi Step Chains

9.0

8.0

Autonomous Execution

8.0

* Task scores (1–10) are algorithmically generated from publicly available data.

Data is sourced from public information and vendor websites. It may not always be up-to-date — verify pricing and features directly with the vendor before purchasing.Report inaccuracy

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, AutoGen or Trigger.dev?

Both are strong options. AutoGen has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews), while Trigger.dev has a rating of 0.0/5 (0 reviews). The best choice depends on your specific use case, budget, and workflow requirements.

Is AutoGen cheaper than Trigger.dev?

AutoGen starts at free (open_source model). Trigger.dev starts at free (freemium model). Use the Cost Calculator above for a detailed estimate.

What are the main differences between AutoGen and Trigger.dev?

AutoGen — "Build and orchestrate multi-agent AI systems with conversational capabilities". Trigger.dev — "Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows in TypeScript". Key differences include their pricing models, platform support, integrations, and technical capabilities. See the Feature Comparison table above for a complete side-by-side breakdown.

Can I use AutoGen and Trigger.dev together?

Explore Alternatives

AutoGen Alternatives

Tools similar to AutoGen

Trigger.dev Alternatives

Tools similar to Trigger.dev

Compare More AI Tools

Use our comparison tool to compare up to 5 AI tools side-by-side with AI-powered recommendations.